LynxVol
V,B
- Joined
- May 5, 2010
- Messages
- 13,887
- Likes
- 5,896
Should be against board rules imo.
Here's the quote so he doesn't get the clicks
I think hes been benefitted from that (AD change), one SEC assistant
told us. If they had a stable AD, I bet hes gone. I know a lot of coaches
who feel like theyre kind of taking it easy on him. Its been there for
the taking for them. They never took it.
What's your point with these comments? We should just accept it and be good with clowns constantly throwing out "hit pieces" against us?
My point is that these "hit pieces" are more like "baby chick peck pieces" nobody cares. Well some do, the 12 on here and whoever gives them money. When you give them attention and rant and rave it gives them attention and that is what they are really after. Haney is a toddler, quit treating him like Darth Vader.
The bolded is what they are really after. Not attention. Attention that results in less money and customers is not an ideal business plan under any circumstance.
Customers care enough to take action that affects the bottom line of 247. UT cares enough to limit access (allegedly) which will create less original content which creates less competitive advantage. 247 cares enough to respond and the UT site cares enough to separate themselves from the buffoonery.
I wonder how many customers they have actually lost and really how many because of Haney and not because they can just come over here and see it for free.
My point is that these "hit pieces" are more like "baby chick peck pieces" nobody cares. Well some do, the 12 on here and whoever gives them money. When you give them attention and rant and rave it gives them attention and that is what they are really after. Haney is a toddler, quit treating him like Darth Vader.
I'm sure Haney cost them some subs but I think the bigger issue for them is access being restricted. Sounds like their sources have dried up on the Hill.