That's all fine and dandy until you remember Florida and Georgia Tech are bad football teams.
I don't think they're bad teams. Bad teams are Mizzou, Indiana State, umass. Not elite but descent. Ga tech will probably finish 8-4, 9-3. Who knows with Fl we have said they will be bad for two years and each year they win the sece. Be our luck they finish 10-1 or some B.S. like that.
UT students planning a walk-out during the UMASS game. That could be one of the final nails in the coffin for Lyle
You've gotta think it through, though. Malzahn was extended before the 2016 season in the middle of a year on his contract. Butch would theoretically be extended after the 2017 season towards the end of a year of his contract.I seriously doubt that's what the OP was talking about.
What some people are suggesting is that we add a year to his deal but the buyout total gets negotiated down.
Nobody has suggested that an extension would come with an escalated buyout. Just another year of the same.
You say you always look at the money, but you say Butch will leave on his own? When has a coach ever quit and forfeited their buyout? He's not good enough to get an upgrade, so Butch quitting = Butch losing money = that will never happen.
He is owed $2.5 m per year. Not 2.You've gotta think it through, though. Malzahn was extended before the 2016 season in the middle of a year on his contract. Butch would theoretically be extended after the 2017 season towards the end of a year of his contract.
Right now Butch is owed $2 million/ year left on his contract (currently 4 if you count 2017). If he is extended for one year at the end of the 2017 season and the numbers stay the same, he will be owed $2 million/ year left on his contract (4 years--2018,2019,2020,2021). So in essence, the numbers stay the same. Just with a year tacked on.
And as far as nobody suggesting an escalated buyout, I'm sure Sexton and Butch will be angling for just that (not sure if they'll have the chips on the table to get that though). They'd understand that an extension like the one Malzahn got wouldn't really make Butch any safer a year from now.
He is owed $2.5 m per year. Not 2.
I think we're basically arguing over semantics here.Obviously an extension would come with another year of buyout. UT would only save money by not extending him which they have already done this past season.
Like I've been saying it will never be cheaper than it is right now.
The OP wasn't suggesting what you are. Feel pretty confident in that.
Sexton and CBJ are gonna want that year added on at the current rate. The year is what is important, not the rate. Nothing he has done has suggested anyone would consider an escalated buyout.
Link?
Nah, jk I'm not that lazy.
Anyway, you're wrong. Here's a link to a breakdown of his contract along with a PDF of the contract itself if you wanna check it out for yourself.
https://hkm.com/football/contracts/butch-jones/
I think we're basically arguing over semantics here.
But saying it will never be cheaper is a little disengenous because a one year contract extension with the buyout numbers kept the same means that firing him mid/post 2017 season and mid/post 2018 season would cost the exact same amount of money as far as the buyout is concerned.
There will literally be riots in Knoxville and no tickets sold for 2018 if that happens
I'd want a new coach with 7-5 (maybe even with 8-4, depending on how exactly we got there). But if it's a one year punt like Malzahn's contract, I might get the strategy. Not sure the coaching pool will be quite as good this year as next year. Currie might wanna wait and see how a couple of P5 Coordinators/G5 coaches do for another season before making a move if there's no worthwhile P5 HCs he thinks he can attract.
Ok. Hard to keep up with would of and should ofs
If butch goes 7-5 and is brought back like you think will happen should he get an extension?