Recruiting Forum Off Topic Thread III

[KnoxLandcruiser]

If she claims them, and then I also claim them, what happens?

If she claims them and her return is processed first, then your return would likely be rejected if you try to e-file.

So then you could paper file your return. You would likely get a notice or correspondence audit once your return is processed that you can respond to accordingly. If the facts and circumstances support your claim then you will be allowed the benefit on your return and her return will be adjusted by the IRS.

It would be a hassle but it's probably worth it. You might point out to her that if she files a tax return claiming a dependent that she does not qualify to claim under the dependency tests then she is filing a fraudulent return and she'll have to pay up eventually. The IRS moves slow but they will get it right if you provide them with the information.

edited to add: If you "need" your refund asap, then you can e-file without the kids (assuming "with the kids" gets rejected) and then file an amended return on paper claiming the kids. This gets some of your refund on the front end and also gives you an opportunity to explain that they qualify as your dependents based on the facts and circumstances.

 

[HoleInTheRoof]

If she claims them and her return is processed first, then your return would likely be rejected if you try to e-file.

So then you could paper file you return. You would likely get a notice or correspondence audit once your return is processed that you can respond to accordingly. If the facts and circumstances support your claim then you will be allowed the benefit on your return and her return will be adjusted by the IRS.

It would be a hassle but it's probably worth it. You might point out to her that if she files a tax return claiming a dependent that she does not qualify to claim under the dependency tests then she is filing a fraudulent return and she'll have to pay up eventually. The IRS moves slow but they will get it right if you provide them with the information.

Awesome. Thanks.

I appreciate everyones responses. You guys are all my new best friends and we should totally hang out. I'm free next Tuesday.

 

[KnoxLandcruiser]

also, I edited my original post about e-filing then amending.

 

[Glitch]

Take it to the Off-Top....

Carry on.

 

[SergeantVol]

If she claims them and her return is processed first, then your return would likely be rejected if you try to e-file.

So then you could paper file your return. You would likely get a notice or correspondence audit once your return is processed that you can respond to accordingly. If the facts and circumstances support your claim then you will be allowed the benefit on your return and her return will be adjusted by the IRS.

It would be a hassle but it's probably worth it. You might point out to her that if she files a tax return claiming a dependent that she does not qualify to claim under the dependency tests then she is filing a fraudulent return and she'll have to pay up eventually. The IRS moves slow but they will get it right if you provide them with the information.

edited to add: If you "need" your refund asap, then you can e-file without the kids (assuming "with the kids" gets rejected) and then file an amended return on paper claiming the kids. This gets some of your refund on the front end and also gives you an opportunity to explain that they qualify as your dependents based on the facts and circumstances.

Or he can change his withholdings to not have the government steal as much of his money.

#TaxationIsTheft

 

[The Dog]

Btw, Roof, if u ever fall behind in child support, the government will take all your tax return or the amount u owe and supposedly give it to the kids/ex-wife. I know u have custody, now, just saying if u owe anything.

 

[InVOLuntary]

Newt. Something has come up and I can't fish this weekend. Let's try for next weekend.

 

[SergeantVol]

Newt. Something has come up and I can't fish this weekend. Let's try for next weekend.

I’ll go with ya newt. Come on down to Hattiesburg, we will go fishing and kayaking on the Pearl River near Picayune.

 

[InVOLuntary]

I’ll go with ya newt. Come on down to Hattiesburg, we will go fishing and kayaking on the Pearl River near Picayune.

Newt don't like no stinking carp.

 

[engineerVOL]

Mookie Betts hit for the cycle tonight

 

[SergeantVol]

Newt don't like no stinking carp.

What about gar?

 

[volatil]

Mookie Betts hit for the cycle tonight

Still not a Vol

 

[InVOLuntary]

What about gar?

 

[Brillovol]

Still not a Vol

He’s a Vol in my book.

 

[bignewt]

Newt don't like no stinking carp.

All good. I can do next Saturday maybe, I'm heading to the Caverns outside of Pelham next Sunday to catch Band of Horses show.

 

[SugarCC]

If he's smart enough to play middle linebacker at the major college level, he does not have a learning disorder.

Aaannd...just now I've heard the dumbest thing I've heard this week. Einstein couldn't add 2+2, genius. GTFO with that stupid sh*t.

 

[SmokinBob]

The IPhone 7...and I have the latest update. I’m using Google to navigate VN and VQ. I was having to log in every time I switched apps on safari.

I have to open Volnation every day on my iPad but not on my iPhone. I have multiple apps open and a few windows in Safari but always have to re-open Volnation on the iPad only. Weird.

 

[KnoxLandcruiser]

I guess there won't be a girls of West Va thread?

Do they have internet yet? Will there be a "What other fanbases are saying" thread? Or would that require someone to actually go to West Virginia and ask?

 

[SmokinBob]

If she claims them and her return is processed first, then your return would likely be rejected if you try to e-file.

So then you could paper file your return. You would likely get a notice or correspondence audit once your return is processed that you can respond to accordingly. If the facts and circumstances support your claim then you will be allowed the benefit on your return and her return will be adjusted by the IRS.

It would be a hassle but it's probably worth it. You might point out to her that if she files a tax return claiming a dependent that she does not qualify to claim under the dependency tests then she is filing a fraudulent return and she'll have to pay up eventually. The IRS moves slow but they will get it right if you provide them with the information.

edited to add: If you "need" your refund asap, then you can e-file without the kids (assuming "with the kids" gets rejected) and then file an amended return on paper claiming the kids. This gets some of your refund on the front end and also gives you an opportunity to explain that they qualify as your dependents based on the facts and circumstances.

When you do paper file, include a copy of your court documents with your tax return.

Edit: I'm not an attorney

 

[Tidal Surge]

...Einstein couldn't add 2+2...

Are you sure about that?

 

[Big Gucci Sosa]

"white privilege" thing

 

[SugarCC]

Are you sure about that?

Years ago, I read that he couldn't do simple math.

 

[SSVol]

My point wasn't political. It was that when we say tone deaf things it gives other ammunition to support dumb stuff like white privilege. Perhaps if we all just accepted that our experiences are shaped by many things (race, wealth, mentors, geography, etc), maybe we would be quicker to offer grace and would sound a bit less tone deaf.

 

[Sleegro]

When you do paper file, include a copy of your court documents with your tax return.

Edit: I'm not an attorney

As long as you stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night I believe you.

 

[SmokinBob]

As long as you stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night I believe you.