SmokyRiverDog
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2017
- Messages
- 2,707
- Likes
- 3,717
Inflation. Propaganda. Fear mongering.We are at 84,000 deaths today. Will be over 100,000 by June 1st. It has been here since January, how the Fuu do you think it is less harmful than the flu.
We are at 84,000 deaths today. Will be over 100,000 by June 1st. It has been here since January, how the Fuu do you think it is less harmful than the flu.
In all actuality we don’t know but it is most likely significantly less84k?
CDC says 60k. And by their own admission extremely liberal.
Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)
84k?
CDC says 60k. And by their own admission extremely liberal.
Provisional Death Counts for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)
This has hasn’t been about a virus for a while.
This has never been about protecting the most vulnerable. The grassroots, boots on the ground doctors and nurses are not being listened to. I feel sorry for them. They want to help and know what works, but can’t do anything about it. And certainly won’t be heard.
Same folks that think abortion is “healthcare” are putting the Covid-positive patients back into the nursing home.
That said, I wear a mask in public indoor places because I feel like Shredder from TMNT. I don’t know why bass hates humanity and Jesus.
![]()
Just when we were coming together as a country this happens lolWell, Fox has picked up the "numbers" issue on COVID this AM on their website. They must read VN RF.
We are messing this up as a nation, especially in the medical research industry. Knowingly analyzing flawed numbers to make recommendations will not lead to good decisions. It makes those who use logic question the motives and the people doing it. A study of point of view contrasts are Fauci and Birx. Fauci rolls with it and says it is worse than stated. Birx says she cannot trust the numbers. Which of those two is actually paying attention to all of the proven flaws of reporting and which is glossing over all of the proven flaws in reporting? Who stands to profit the most for the cases being higher or lower? Think your answer through if you read this. Who is all about vaccines and therapeutics development and who is all about the immediate reduction of cases regardless of method for getting there? Who blew off POTUS recommendations on an internationally reported inexpensive therapeutic and prophylactic solution despite singing the praises of its primary med's success in treating a related disease with a common host receptor to COVID-19 in 2005? How much will Remdisivir cost per dose and how does the developer financially benefit from a patent on same? The open promotion of that drug occurs even though the success for just reducing symptoms and having no ability to cure is just in one third of patients.
Why are the actual CDC numbers not being reported? Where do the other reported numbers come from?
The reporting system is so bad and that states did not even get dying "of" versus "with" consistently applied nationwide. Even that had to be political. Follow the money, it usually leads to the motives for doing and not doing things the right ways.
The Tanzanian President may be smarter than all of them.
What did panic get us as a nation? More division, more economic loss, other forms of death and suffering. Who benefits from that?
Again - who benefits from more national division, more economic loss, other forms of death and suffering?
Look what all of it has done on here amongst us for a sample.
So you are saying China was responsible.Well, Fox has picked up the "numbers" issue on COVID this AM on their website. They must read VN RF.
We are messing this up as a nation, especially in the medical research industry. Knowingly analyzing flawed numbers to make recommendations will not lead to good decisions. It makes those who use logic question the motives and the people doing it. A study of point of view contrasts are Fauci and Birx. Fauci rolls with it and says it is worse than stated. Birx says she cannot trust the numbers. Which of those two is actually paying attention to all of the proven flaws of reporting and which is glossing over all of the proven flaws in reporting? Who stands to profit the most for the cases being higher or lower? Think your answer through if you read this. Who is all about vaccines and therapeutics development and who is all about the immediate reduction of cases regardless of method for getting there? Who blew off POTUS recommendations on an internationally reported inexpensive therapeutic and prophylactic solution despite singing the praises of its primary med's success in treating a related disease with a common host receptor to COVID-19 in 2005? How much will Remdisivir cost per dose and how does the developer financially benefit from a patent on same? The open promotion of that drug occurs even though the success for just reducing symptoms and having no ability to cure is just in one third of patients.
Why are the actual CDC numbers not being reported? Where do the other reported numbers come from?
The reporting system is so bad and that states did not even get dying "of" versus "with" consistently applied nationwide. Even that had to be political. Follow the money, it usually leads to the motives for doing and not doing things the right ways.
The Tanzanian President may be smarter than all of them.
What did panic get us as a nation? More division, more economic loss, other forms of death and suffering. Who benefits from that?
Again - who benefits from more national division, more economic loss, other forms of death and suffering?
Look what all of it has done on here amongst us for a sample.
So you are saying China was responsible.