I don't really care if we're good. As far as I'm concerned, we've never been "not" good, and you can take criticism however you choose. If you're immune to criticism, that's on you.
And it's pretty small and cowardly to call my post fallacious (false) hubris, and then go all soft and change your boundaries where this:
...is apparently unacceptable in your view.
But the point is that you took it upon yourself to pull a chair up to this game--the game of debating belief structures. And it looks terribly foolish to pull a chair up to a game, only to then be forced to empty your pockets and show that you don't even have enough on you to ante up.
Minimum stakes in the game of debating belief structures is the belief in (1) our ability to ascertain truth, and (2) the ethical acceptability of correcting someone else's beliefs.
That's just the minimum bet, sir. For how can you debate belief systems (which is the act of asserting your truth over another's) if you can't affirm your truth as truth, and your actions in correcting as ethical?
Again... Any thinking person will recognize your absurdity and write you off immediately as one with nothing to offer the conversation.