n_huffhines
What's it gonna cost?
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 87,634
- Likes
- 52,738
I believe that our government should be held liable for slavery and the families of victims are entitled to receive compensation, but all that being said IDK how we even begin to go about this, and even if it's done in the most expedient manner possible, we can't afford it.
Honest question.....
I am 1 percent black.
No idea how but it's in my dna.
I'm like 60 percent German, 39 percent irish/Scottish and then 1 percent black.
Would I qualify?
I mean what is the cut off?
Or will you have to trace your lineage back to a slave?
What if you are black but your parents were never slaves and lived free in the union?
Who here is actually against reparations as a matter of principle? You'd have to believe either that
1) the government should not be held liable for atrocities
or
2) not think the institutionalization of slavery was an atrocity
I get it, the statute of limitations and all that...that's a legal and a feasibility thing, tho. Not a point of principle.
Who here is actually against reparations as a matter of principle? You'd have to believe either that
1) the government should not be held liable for atrocities
or
2) not think the institutionalization of slavery was an atrocity
I get it, the statute of limitations and all that...that's a legal and a feasibility thing, tho. Not a point of principle.
Had reparations been made back in 1865 I’d have no issue with it. Slavery was an atrocity and hard to truly fathom, but reparations?.... yeah nahWho here is actually against reparations as a matter of principle? You'd have to believe either that
1) the government should not be held liable for atrocities
or
2) not think the institutionalization of slavery was an atrocity
I get it, the statute of limitations and all that...that's a legal and a feasibility thing, tho. Not a point of principle.
Who here is actually against reparations as a matter of principle? You'd have to believe either that
1) the government should not be held liable for atrocities
or
2) not think the institutionalization of slavery was an atrocity
I get it, the statute of limitations and all that...that's a legal and a feasibility thing, tho. Not a point of principle.
where's the line of demarcation on government atrocities? it's not just those impacted by slavery - it's an ongoing thing since the founding. there are degrees to be sure and that's what I'm getting at - where do you draw the line and say in principle these people who were screwed by the government are due but these people who were screwed by the government are not?
I personally think the price has already been paid in lives, trillions in assistance, and really anti-descrimination laws that are covertly discrimnatory.
where's the line of demarcation on government atrocities? it's not just those impacted by slavery - it's an ongoing thing since the founding. there are degrees to be sure and that's what I'm getting at - where do you draw the line and say in principle these people who were screwed by the government are due but these people who were screwed by the government are not?
I'm not trying to quibble over what event is an atrocity and what is not. I'm going higher concept and staying out of those weeds. The government should be held liable for atrocities. You can decide what the atrocities are, which is why I gave you the option to say slavery is not an atrocity.