There's a time for outrage and there's a time for following the process. Real change has come through amending the Constitution. Slavery didn't end because we fought a war. Slavery ended with the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment. Real change comes from working within the system, not through violence and lawlessness.
Yes, the hate you spew. Anyone who isn't lockstep with your opinion you call racist. Anyone who isn't onboard with your glee for violence and vandalism you call racist. I'm not defending anyone's feelings, I'm defending their right to have them. It's called the Constitution. Individuals are guaranteed rights. Even hateful individuals such as yourself and the Klan.
Well you're talking about two very different things. Small statues vs a miles long wall separating countries.
If the basis for removing a statue is outrage, then any statue that outrages anyone falls under the same rule. If one side has the right to topple statues they find offensive without consequence, then the same right is afforded to all. This isn't a battle of who can destroy more. At least it shouldn't be. If anarchy is what you want, don't be surprised when an opposing force uses the same tactics. Push long enough and hard enough, and someone will push back. Chaos is not the answer.
No, I'm accusing you of calling anyone who disagrees with your complete opinion a racist, a Nazi, a Klansman, or whatever else. No one has argued against equality. They've argued against the rampant, unchecked destruction. And when they do, you start hurling out your accusations. Even when you don't outright say it, you insinuate it. That is its own form of bigotry.
Not really. She knowingly broke the law and was arrested for it, and in the process brought attention to an unfair rule. She didn't even set out to make a statement, she just refused to give up her seat. It was a racist policy, and by standing up to it, people took notice. How many of those out there are willing to be arrested, as she was, to make a point?
