KB5252
Repeat Forward Progress Victim
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2008
- Messages
- 37,438
- Likes
- 35,721
She didn't kick and scream and resist arrest. I consider peaceful protest within the system. Maybe you do not. I'm all for marches, or bringing attention to injustice through nonviolent means. I'm not about the erupting chaos that has left people dead. I'm not about mob rule. I want change, but not at the expense of one's soul.She broke the law and got arrested. That’s not “within the system” and never will be
I don't think MLK would support the violence that has erupted in the wake of George Floyd. I don't think he would support the killing of innocents, or the burning of businesses. That was not his way.
I need not remind you that poverty, the gaps in our society, the gulfs between inordinate superfluous wealth and abject deadening poverty have brought about a great deal of despair, a great deal of tension, a great deal of bitterness. We’ve seen this bitterness expressed over the last few summers in the violent explosions in our cities.
And the great tragedy is that the nation continues in its national policy to ignore the conditions that brought the riots or the rebellions into being. For in the final analysis, the riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it that America’s failed to hear? It’s failed to hear that the plight of the Negro poor has worsened over the last few years. It has failed to hear that the promises of justice and freedom have not been met. It has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice, humanity, and equality, and it is still true. It is still true that these things are being ignored.
“Urban riots must now be recognized as durable social phenomena,” he told the assembled crowd of mostly white doctors and academics. “They may be deplored, but they are there and should be understood. Urban riots are a special form of violence. They are not insurrections. The rioters are not seeking to seize territory or to attain control of institutions. They are mainly intended to shock the white community. They are a distorted form of social protest. The looting which is their principal feature serves many functions. It enables the most enraged and deprived Negro to take hold of consumer goods with the ease the white man does by using his purse. Often the Negro does not even want what he takes; he wants the experience of taking.”
Then I disagree with him on that. I believe in justice and equality for all. Killing innocent people is not the way to make change. Looting and unfettered chaos is not the way to win support. I agree that too many white people are complacent, and don't do enough. I 100% agree with MLK on that. But there has to be a better way. Where are the true message carriers? Where are the leaders of the movement? There is so much more to strive for that goes unnoticed to satisfy primal urges. We are meant to be better than this. We are meant to rise above violence and hate.
I don't think MLK would support the violence that has erupted in the wake of George Floyd. I don't think he would support the killing of innocents, or the burning of businesses. That was not his way.
No $hit, Sherlock. Had he lived, Malcolm X would have advocated violence. By the time King was assassinated, peaceful protest was losing ground to those who believed in violent protest.
I had the great fortune to take a class on American Religious History from an AA scholar who had worked for SCLC and knew King well. He said that black people were tired of waiting on society to change under non-violent protest and wanted to be taken more seriously. There was a shift in the Black Power (SNCC) movement towards violent protest, which we saw break out after MLK's assasination.Curious why you say peaceful protest were losing ground and what stopped them violent protest?
actually Malcolm X in his later years, stated that his call for violence in the name of Islam and Black Militancy was wrong, and that Islam was a terrible cult. He was not the same person at his death as he was during his misguided yearsNo $hit, Sherlock. Had he lived, Malcolm X would have advocated violence. By the time King was assassinated, peaceful protest was losing ground to those who believed in violent protest.
actually Malcolm X in his later years, stated that his call for violence in the name of Islam and Black Militancy was wrong, and that Islam was a terrible cult. He was not the same person at his death as he was during his misguided years
I'm gonna spray paint shards of concrete and sell it to liberals on e-bay with commemorative plaques of authenticity to celebrate statues coming down.
They used the home shopping channel in the 90's after the Berlin Wall came down.
I guess you feel like you have a good idea but it's only the Republicans that need such things to commemorate their loses.I'm gonna spray paint shards of concrete and sell it to liberals on e-bay with commemorative plaques of authenticity to celebrate statues coming down.
They used the home shopping channel in the 90's after the Berlin Wall came down.
Most people with rational thinking should be able to process the complex idea of a work of art being different or even separate than the worst of the authors past.Awesome dude. Tell me the correct answer then.
Again, here's the question:
We've actually been having an ongoing debate at work for like the past 6 months (pre-CV19) about whether one can separate the product/services of a person and their beliefs/actions. Example: HP Lovecraft. One dude at work thinks his art is the bomb, and has collected prints and books about the guy for years. Now he's come to understand that the man was a unrepentant white supremacist. Can we separate and accept his art (great) for what it is, despite the fact that the man was fundamentally flawed (racist)? Where do you draw the line on this sort of thing? Say you had a beautiful original painting by Hitler. Do you burn it as a statement against everything the man stood for, or do you hide the fact that it was by him, or do you openly just accept the art for what it is - regardless of the artist?
actually Malcolm X in his later years, stated that his call for violence in the name of Islam and Black Militancy was wrong, and that Islam was a terrible cult. He was not the same person at his death as he was during his misguided years