bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 73,742
- Likes
- 49,397
How funny, you dictated Barnes expectations by providing us with the numbers from the prediction thread, yet when it comes to Tyndall only your opinion counts and not that same thread, I wonder why?
I do also think it's quite funny that with a lesser roster you predicted more wins than you did last season, I'm doubting you predicted 13 wins last year for Tyndall prior to the first game, but I will definitely go look for it when I get some time.
Just like Buzz you attempt to change the subject when you know you've been had, how funny.
For me to say Barnes just did an utterly awful job he'd probably have to win 14 games or less, maybe 15, if he wins 15-16 games it's a meh job, about what I expected, 17-19 wins was a very good job, 20+ wins and he deserves COY considerations.
I was actually sticking right to the subject, thus the reason I brought up your exact quote, why don't you address the post instead of trying to change the topic?
Change the subject?
we are talking grades
Barnes deserves a bad grade and even you said it.
I mean you even said 14 wins was an utterly awful job. 13 is well below an average grade of a C and you damn well know it because you have posted it
And where have I said opposite? I actually had Barnes as a D and Tyndall a D+ initially, maybe I should've kept it that way. My greater point was that neither coach "met expectations", and that includes Tyndall who you try to say overachieve, of course your standard for Tyndall and Barnes is different which is no shock.
As I said Tyndall won 1 not more than 2 more games that I thought he would. I also loved how we were competitive in nearly every game and played with our hair on fire. Thus a C+ grade.
Barnes team fell short of what I expected(16). His team played very hard at times and at others they didn't. There was serious disconnect with him and some of the roster. Thus why he gets a D for me
I don't give a damn what else you post or anyone else post about those grades.
They are my opinion and they aren't changing
Huh
Isn't a message board for posting opinions and discussing them?
Or it it just for posting opinions that are popular?
You just said you "don't give a damn" about what others think of your opinion. If you don't care about what others think about what you posted, then how are you encouraging any discussion?
Or is it that you only care to discuss your opinion with those that agree with you?
I am not sure what to say about this other than you must not understand basketball much or have zero idea the current state of Tennessee basketball. This is a 3 year project at least and making assumptions based on this roster is a waste of time. Next year will be another building block as 77% (10 of 13) of our team will be Freshman or Sophomores. So I think we need to see where we are year 3 - If you have any specific examples of coaches taking a roster this bad and making them a above .500 team I would love to be corrected. But this is a B+ for me.
BTO I think this is the thread you were looking for.
http://www.volnation.com/forum/tenn...icial-2014-2015-season-prediction-thread.html
As I said Tyndall won 1 not more than 2 more games that I thought he would. I also loved how we were competitive in nearly every game and played with our hair on fire. Thus a C+ grade.
Barnes team fell short of what I expected(16). His team played very hard at times and at others they didn't. There was serious disconnect with him and some of the roster. Thus why he gets a D for me
I don't give a damn what else you post or anyone else post about those grades.
They are my opinion and they aren't changing
So you use the prediction thread to make your point Barnes didn't meet expectations, then use solely your opinion to determine Tyndall exceeded expectations? Why is that?
Yup, it sure was. A whole lot of 17&18 win predictions, talk of NCAAT, NIT, much fewer thought .500 was the expectation, guess Tyndall failed to meet expectations too.
Fixed the link for you.I just read the article below and am pretty concerned about Barnes and the long term health for the team:
This is Texas? Shaka Smart overcomes red tape, high expectations, internal politics in first year | Hookem.com
Looks like Smart had a lot of legacy issues to deal with and while Barnes is only called out for his "hard driving style" some of the academic and cultural challenges tell me a lot about what he allowed to happen under his watch.
Bottom line is Texas' new coach did a lot with his time and they are playing in the tourney. We have a lot of questions after this season and the D+ seems warranted.
I hope that I am wrong and he can create a healthy program that contends vs. defines itself by a few upsets here and there....
Thoughts?