Right Wingers Happier Than Left Wingers

Is that really how the "Lock her up" chant ended? Just admit you're OK with one side saying it but not the other

BTW Trump actually did try to move on guns and it was declared unconstitutional. But let's fear the other side's words more
Trump quote
“I don’t think they will be disappointed. I think I will explain it that we in many ways will save our country,” he said, adding that prosecuting Clinton “would be very, very divisive for the country

And yes his gun control was shut down as it should have been.. Point??
 
Trump quote
“I don’t think they will be disappointed. I think I will explain it that we in many ways will save our country,” he said, adding that prosecuting Clinton “would be very, very divisive for the country

And yes his gun control was shut down as it should have been.. Point??
Then Harris' will too. No harm no foul right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
It would be yes.... Is there something you getting at or just continuing to throw crap and hope something sticks to make you feel better??
That I've yet to see you call out any of the numerous posts making wild claims based on what Harris says. However when the same is brought up about Trump you're very diligent in your defense. You simply don't believe your claims apply to everyone. And when they actually do act on them you will dismiss them if its your guy. We need less of that in the country
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
That I've yet to see you call out any of the numerous posts making wild claims based on what Harris says. However when the same is brought up about Trump you're very diligent in your defense. You simply don't believe your claims apply to everyone. And when they actually do act on them you will dismiss them if its your guy. We need less of that in the country
Why would I defend a candidate I don't like, when is that a requirement and why are you the arbiter of that....? Seems your upset I don't subscribe to for leftist (fake centrist) ideology... Just not fit RFK so you can complain more while over offering nothing of a solution . I'm good.. I won't respond anymore it's pointless.
 
Why would I defend a candidate I don't like, when is that a requirement and why are you the arbiter of that....? Seems your upset I don't subscribe to for leftist (fake centrist) ideology... Just not fit RFK so you can complain more while over offering nothing of a solution . I'm good.. I won't respond anymore it's pointless.
No I'm just calling you out for being partisan and dishonest. I don't care who you support but being consistent is really not hard

I've offered plenty of solutions in this forum that I would support for making this country better. The only people making that claim either don't understand the proposal or ignore it on purpose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MercyPercy
No I'm just calling you out for being partisan and dishonest. I don't care who you support but being consistent is really not hard

I've offered plenty of solutions in this forum that I would support for making this country better. The only people making that claim either don't understand the proposal or ignore it on purpose.
I have to respond.. Find where I have claimed I'm not partisan??
Your arguing something in your own head much like other liberals here...
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
I'm being told Trump has big promises this time so people should vote for him. Those same people seem to ignore actions in place of words.

So we should just ignore someone making campaign promises to jail their opponents until they actually do it?

Are you going to tell all those posters screeching about Kamala and gun control that it's just words? She hasn't actually done anything
The difference is Trump has 4 years of actually governing with the opportunity to lock her up and he did not do so.
 
The difference is Trump has 4 years of actually governing with the opportunity to lock her up and he did not do so.
Because they were friends and it was never going to happen. But that didn't stop his supporters from chanting for the idea of locking up political opponents. See, that's the real key point that they thought it was something that should actually be done
 
I have to respond.. Find where I have claimed I'm not partisan??
Your arguing something in your own head much like other liberals here...

I don't know if someone needs to tell you this, but when you claim to be partisan, especially as a voter, it means you are willfully ignorant and averted to reason.

You're basically calling yourself a lemming. Lol.
 
Exactly. Many do. I have friends of means who hold blue collar folks in contempt.

Silly if you ask me, but that is definitely a thing.

I think some posters here feel better about their agnosticism / atheism after poking at the christians.
Schadenfreude is real.

I have seen the poking at Christians to which you refer, and find it pointlessly antagonistic. In the same vein, I see consistent mocking and derision of LGBT folks in a high percentage of threads here. I think it makes the religious and conservative feel better about themselves as well.
 
Schadenfreude is real.

I have seen the poking at Christians to which you refer, and find it pointlessly antagonistic. In the same vein, I see consistent mocking and derision of LGBT folks in a high percentage of threads here. I think it makes the religious and conservative feel better about themselves as well.

When you think about it, being homophobic is pretty gay. You're letting a dude control your feelings rent free.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
Because they were friends and it was never going to happen. But that didn't stop his supporters from Chettinad for the idea of locking up political opponents. See, that's the real key point that they thought it was something that should actually be done
Given the lawfare standard established from over the past couple of years, do you think she should have been brought to trial?
 
I don't know if someone needs to tell you this, but when you claim to be partisan, especially as a voter, it means you are willfully ignorant and averted to reason.

You're basically calling yourself a lemming. Lol.

Disagree. I’m certain there are plenty of people who have relied upon reason to reach both incredibly liberal/pro-democrat and incredibly conservative/pro-republican stances.
 
That I've yet to see you call out any of the numerous posts making wild claims based on what Harris says. However when the same is brought up about Trump you're very diligent in your defense. You simply don't believe your claims apply to everyone. And when they actually do act on them you will dismiss them if its your guy. We need less of that in the country
You should actually compare records of the two.
 
Disagree. I’m certain there are plenty of people who have relied upon reason to reach both incredibly liberal/pro-democrat and incredibly conservative/pro-republican stances.

Disagree all you want. To be completely one way or the other abandons reason in American politics.

Whodeyc isn't what I or most would call a critical thinker.
 

VN Store



Back
Top