Electric Orange
𝓜𝓪𝓴𝓮 𝓐𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓡𝓸𝓬𝓴 𝓐𝓰𝓪𝓲𝓷
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2010
- Messages
- 21,080
- Likes
- 76,232
The acutal definition of photophobia is fear of light...but it is meant a sensativity to light....completely different from not liking something and your body rejecting it...but the point remains...no rational person fears homosexuals.(id even go as far as to say most dont like or dislike them unless its shoved down thier throats) .its a another jab that leftist throw around when they can make an argument...It can just mean an aversion to something. The definition isn't restricted to "fear". Photophobia isn't the fear of light, it's the aversion to light.
Instead of making it into an erroneous semantic battle, just take the word as the poster intends it. He's obviously talking about people who express that they don't like gays or make fun of gays. That's the point.
View attachment 450876
The acutal definition of photophobia is fear of light...but it is meant a sensativity to light....completely different from not liking something and your body rejecting it...but the point remains...no rational person fears homosexuals.(id even go as far as to say most dont like or dislike them unless its shoved down thier throats) .its a another jab that leftist throw around when they can make an argument...
I don't dislike BLM supporters until they are screaming in my face..
As nouns the difference between phobia and aversionThe correct semantics matter. By your own admission, ______ + phobia doesn't necessarily mean "fear of". Stop with the BS.
Adding aversions to phobias are new. Withing the last 25 years. Earliest reference to photophobia didnt exist in definition till 1997
I mean, this is one time where King raises a valid point and detracting from it with petty ******** is pretty lame.
I remember when the right had pitchforks ready because Twitter wasn't doing enough to moderate that kind of content.
Is Federal Censorship Coming? Biden Admin Creating ‘Disinformation Governance Board’: Report
After Joe Biden was declared the winner of the 2020 presidential election, independent journalist Glenn Greenwald predicted that Democrats would use the force of the government to crack down on conservative reporting under the guise of combatting “national security” threats.
Now President Biden’s Department of Homeland Security is reportedly working to create a “disinformation governance board” to counter what they determine to be false information relating to national security.
On Wednesday, Politico reported that DHS is creating the board “to coordinate countering misinformation related to homeland security, focused specifically on irregular migration and Russia.”
Is Federal Censorship Coming? Biden Admin Creating ‘Disinformation Governance Board’: Report | The Daily Wire
Off topic :
Stephen Miller is a creepy-looking dork, with an arrogant, pretentious and smug manner. He seems very impressed with himself, but it's not clear what for.
On topic :
On the subject of free speech, it now appears, that on recently released audio recordings from January of 2021, that House Minority Leader, Rep. Kevin McCarthy, was advocating for some of his fellow House Republicans (including Rep. Matt Gaetz, Rep. Mo Brooks, and Rep. Louie Gohmert) to have their Twitter accounts suspended for things they said on January 6, 2021.
I haven't seen any conservatives / Republicans / Trump supporters criticize McCarthy for these attacks on free speech. I also haven't seen anyone from the right, point out McCarthy's blatant lies, hypocrisy and two-faced nature. He has been very critical of Democrats for doing the exact same thing, which he can also be heard doing on one of those recordings.
Don't tell me that conservatives have a double standard for Republicans now. That would be so disillusioning.