Eh...why?
If you didn't know Schaeffer, and he had the exact same stats as Marve, who would you take?
All I'm saying.
Not at all. They have about the same speed (Brent is a little faster) but Marve's arm is tons better.
Marve, for a qb, is the one with better measureables.
Ya, I see what you are saying. But in my opinion, I see Marve as an athletic QB and I see Schaeffer as just an athlete. Not saying you couldn't win with Schaeffer as a QB, because I think you can - see Vick, Young, etc. I just think the percentages are higher with a guy like Marve.
Schaeffer's arm wasn't weak or anything.
And 6'3, 190 compared to 6'1...whatever I'd have to look it up.
I have a hard time believing Marve is more talented than Schaeffer. Maybe I'm thinking talent in a different fashion, I don't know. Regardless, if an unknown Brent Schaeffer and Robert Marve were trying to come here, and I had to choose one, I'd be the moron to want Schaeffer. The rest of you morons would choose Marve?![]()
Fair enough. Would you take Newton over Marve?
Wait, are we even going to get Marve?
It's average. Marve has an NFL arm, Schaeffer didn't.
Marve had a better freshman year than Matt Stafford.
Schaeffer completed less than 50% of his passes at UT and had 66 yards rushing for the season.
Plus Marve was on a worse team than all three mentioned.
Marve is on a totally different skill level than Schaeffer.
Marve played against some pretty lame competition, still managed to throw 13 picks, 9 TDs, and 1200 some odd yards.
Schaeffer was the #1 JUCO QB coming out of...JUCO.
Marve played against some pretty lame competition, still managed to throw 13 picks, 9 TDs, and 1200 some odd yards. Compared to Schaeffer's 1400, 9 td and 10 picks at Ole Miss.
But I'll give you the big arm, you gotta take the height and speed, though. Both have shoddy brains. But I'm really not trying to compare them now, just coming out of high school. Marve is not head and shoulders above Schaeffer from a talent stand point.
I firmly believe this staff does not feel that a HS QB in this class can come in and start immediately. And they do not want Stephens running the show in 2010 either.
The ACC is the 2nd best defensive conference easily. Look at the players on D that they put in the NFL year in and year out. The ACC had a million teams in bowl games last year as well. I mean, none of them are exceptional, but they are all solid. And don't forget that Shannon had this "great" idea to keep switching Marve and Harris out during the game. So Marve was not playing the whole game and was never allowed to get into rythym...
Projecting at the qb position he is. Marve's freshman stats compared to Schaeffer's stats are far better on a worse team.
An inch or two and a 4.55 versus 4.65 does not mean a lot for a qb when you factor in the arm.
Also look at the schools that recruited them out of high school and that also tells a lot about how valued they were.
If Marve isn't allowed to talk to the coaches, are we even sure if they are interested in him? I mean, he would be free for us to bring in, but if the coaches didn't really want him because he might hurt our chances of getting Cam Newton to transfer in or our chances of bringing in a top recruit. I think our coaches could turn him into a good player for UT, but often wonder what they really think of this kid since they can't talk about him or even talk to him.
Marve was more heralded coming out of high school than Btent Schaefer. You need to watch Marve's vids and compare them to JC. Not even close. Marve was spectacular against better competition. Trust me if you don't have access.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Frosh Schaeffer played, got messed up, and shared time with Ainge, right?
Really, if you put Schaeffer on Georgia Tech's squad, how talented would he be then? Pure pocket passer he was not...but talent-wise, come on! Who would you want on a pick-up game?
As far as offers, KSU, UT, and Auburn (circa 2004) compared to...Bama, Miami, Michigan State (circa 2007)...I fail to see a value difference.
Regardless, I'll take your word for it. But the more I delve...the more eerily similar this sounds..
I guess I have no choice. So no one really thinks we've have a more talented QB than Marve come down the pike? Marve is good, but I just find that hard to believe. What about ainge? Played behind an awful line, put up some great numbers. Tee Martin? Ultra-clutch. How can you possibly compare this, anyway?
Talented? Probably not. That doesn't mean he's going to be as good, but the potential is there.