UTCVol
Soon.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2008
- Messages
- 15,647
- Likes
- 3,887
Maybe not illegal but immoral Yes.Which still isn't illegal.
But if they had sexual relations before her age of consent he can be taken to court for statuatory rape.Probably fluctuates between 2 and 3 years anyway. No point in correcting it because she could be 17 next week, who knows.
We're talking about a kid in a dating relationship with an adult male.
You're making a big deal out of nothing. I started dating my wife when she was 19 and I was 22. A couple of months earlier and she would have been 18. Six months earlier, and she would have been a senior in high school dating a guy who was out of college.
And you can't say she's a kid dating an adult. While it is technically true, it sounds like he's 33 and she's 12. When he was a senior and she was a sophmore, did you object to that? What are you going to do? Make a law that says seniors can only date other seniors and juniors? That's just imbecillic.
You have an overdeveloped sense of morality. It's only a 3 year difference. If that is not okay to you, what is? 18? He'd still technically be an adult. 17? Technically he'd turn 18 while she would still be 17. That would be an adult dating a kid, too. Just chill about it. It's neither immoral nor illegal, whether he transfers to UT or not.
But if they had sexual relations before her age of consent he can be taken to court for statuatory rape.
I doubt that enough time has passed where he wouldn't be charged, I think back to that former HS football recruit that ended up going to jail because he had sex with a 14 year old when he was 18 and even though he was now 21 and she was 17 he was still charged with statuatory rape.
Am I the only person grossly disgusted by this?
I really need to get in contact with the police in Memphis where these acts probably took place and see what can be done.
Everybody here congratulating the guy is :crazy:
Irrelevant.You're making a big deal out of nothing. I started dating my wife when she was 19 and I was 22. A couple of months earlier and she would have been 18. Six months earlier, and she would have been a senior in high school dating a guy who was out of college.
There are laws out there regarding consent.And you can't say she's a kid dating an adult. While it is technically true, it sounds like he's 33 and she's 12. When he was a senior and she was a sophmore, did you object to that? What are you going to do? Make a law that says seniors can only date other seniors and juniors? That's just imbecillic.
Terrico is already 19 I checked his birth date and that would have made him 18 while dating a 15 year old before she turned 16.You have an overdeveloped sense of morality. It's only a 3 year difference. If that is not okay to you, what is? 18? He'd still technically be an adult. 17? Technically he'd turn 18 while she would still be 17. That would be an adult dating a kid, too. Just chill about it. It's neither immoral nor illegal, whether he transfers to UT or not.
When he was 18 and she was 15.Which is irrelevant because at no point in time would it have been illegal.