"How are you feeling about this Madtown? I’d love to hear your perspective. "
Thanks LadyVol1908 for asking.
Here is the quick evolution of my stance toward Coach Warlick.
I thought her initial hire was a mistake (like many here) because I felt she had defined herself as a lifelong assistant, who unlike DeMoss, never moved on to a head coaching role, despite offers.
However, CHW surprised me with how well the team played under her stead during those first 3 years. Offensively, the LVs played with more freedom and flow than they had under the last few seasons under CPS. During that run, I have no doubt they were Izzy Harrison's torn ACL from a final four and maybe more. I began to think I had underestimated Holly.
What has also become clear, however, is that there a was positive legacy from CPS, in terms of discipline and attention to detail, that carried over during those three strong years that meshed nicely with Holly's more forgiving, less demanding, "nice job" approach. The good habits were formed and now the kids could out and play with freedom and flair. Now, unfortunately, we have no foundation and hence, the flair attempts often fall short of success.
So, it has been a slow and steady decline since those three good years, with an occassional uptick here and there. I have been saying consistently that Holly has been burning up the goodwill from her strong start but that her recruiting classes had bought her additional some time.
I have been often brandished a "Holly lover" for that stance, but it really is just a reasoned assessment of the situation. You don't fire CPS's loyal successor who had won 75% of her games and had two top tier recruiting classes coming in, even with some recent down years, without giving her what would appear to outside observers as a fair shot with her blue chip recruits. To do so, would have been a PR disaster for the University.
I thought she would have this year and next to deliver an SEC title and return the LVs back to a final four (or maybe the elite 8 at minimum). I believe the terms of her extension were consistent with the idea that she had, in effect, a two-year probationary period.
My one caveat was that if the team totally fell apart (which I did not envision at the start of the season), then a change might be made sooner. The previous 3 losses were moving in that directtion but they were just so close that I am not sure they necessarily set off a 4 alarm fire at the AD's office.
I would imagine the Alabama loss being not only an historic 4 in a row but also being one of the worst performances in the history of the program has the alarms ringing.
The nationally televised game against ND might be the make-or-break. If the LVs get embarrassed in that game, that is probably the point of no return and UT buys her out or she steps down.
My guess is that the UTAD would still like her to finish the season and then make a change (barring a miraculous turnaround) but a lot hinges on the next week.
Personally, I think a change is definitely needed. And I think it is time to look beyond the LV family and bring in a fresh approach.