Russia Already Interfering With 2020 Election: Seeks to Re-Elect Trump

[Weezer]

So wait, none of the liberal posters actually watched last night's Democratic debate? Talk about an uninformed electorate...

 

[lawgator1]

It's the same ole song but with a second go around early this year in time with the same excuse that the Dems will be using again. Can't come up w/anyone worth a crap to beat Trump at voting booth so it's Russia all over again thinking it'll work this time around......bunch of idiots that will never ever learn how to win back the WH.

View attachment 262559

See, it's not about beating Trump. It's about Russia running our f'>)ing country!!! Cant you understand just how serious this and how inappropriate Trump's reaction has been?

 

[volfanhill]

You're better than posting backhanded compliments.

Lol

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

I don’t think he cares

He's at an all time approval rating w/Americans and doesn't need help to beat a stupid old socialist.....or a gay former mayor dude or a former washed up old VP has been who doesn't know what day it is. Those two old hags are not gonna do nothing but go home & make ham & egg sandwiches.

 

[luthervol]

The left fears Trump because of his following. That's one of the reasons they're constantly putting them down. None of the other 16 Pubs inspired that kind of following. As a person, Trump is despicable, but he voiced concerns that many Americans had. Not always in the best fashion, but he addressed actual concerns rather than fluffing people up. The left still hasn't gotten their **** together enough to realize their disconnect from America, and last night's debate showed it. The Dems want the appeal Trump seems to have. Make jokes or excuses, but the left is jealous they can't find the formula to mimic it. So they keep trying to tear him down, and failing, which makes them look worse.

I don't understand the whole appeal of Trump myself, but it exists. And all the insults the left hurls, all the attempts at neutralizing him, it just seems to make him stronger. But the left doesn't want to see the truth. I think Tulsi tried to tell them, but they didn't want to hear it.

They do rightfully fear Trumpism. History is rife with examples of why that fear is justified.
It is a dilemma when describing something that is horrendous as horrendous only makes it more horrendous.

 

[volfanhill]

Which words are you people having trouble with in the definition. Ruthless? Tyrannical? Leader?

I know the common association but it is an accurate descriptor.

I will choose tyrannical for $500 Alex

 

[Weezer]

See, it's not about beating Trump. It's about Russia running our f'>)ing country!!! Cant you understand just how serious this and how inappropriate Trump's reaction has been?

How is Russia running our country? If you're going to make that claim, then please explain exactly how they are controlling us, because I don't see it.

 

[0nelilreb]

So wait, none of the liberal posters actually watched last night's Democratic debate? Talk about an uninformed electorate...

They don’t need to. Every one of them are on record as saying they will vote for anyone over Trump . This stance is also what makes the argument they have complaining that the Rs should have or could have elected anybody else for the betterment of the country ironic . They have already said they don’t care who it is , they will vote for them . Policies be damned . Lol

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

See, it's not about beating Trump. It's about Russia running our f'>)ing country!!! Cant you understand just how serious this and how inappropriate Trump's reaction has been?

Russia doesn't run this country you idiot redneck. You listen too much crap from Madcow & Joe in the morning lies. Your Dem candidates are terrible horrible picks for president & you bitch about Trump.....good God man.....pull yourself together. You should be going to war w/the Democratic party.......they are some F*cked up people.

 

[luthervol]

It has to bother Congress that Trump's reaction was not to take action but instead to be upset they found out about it.

The ones who haven't completely exorcised their conscious.

 

[Weezer]

They do rightfully fear Trumpism. History is rife with examples of why that fear is justified.
It is a dilemma when describing something that is horrendous as horrendous only makes it more horrendous.

History is rife with examples? You mean like FDR? You only consider it horrendous because your politics don't match up. Trump hasn't done anything "horrendous". That is just so much hyperbole. He may be an ass of a human being, but he hasn't done anything to the levels you keep trying to claim.

 

[luthervol]

So wait, none of the liberal posters actually watched last night's Democratic debate? Talk about an uninformed electorate...

That would imply the debate was informative.
Again, we all know better.

 

[NCFisher]

I would think Bernie would love him some Russians.

The left loved Russia until it was no longer Soviet Russia.

 

[AM64]

I've followed your argument just fine. Perhaps you've forgotten it so far?





You've said that Trump hasn't given a damn about following protocol.

You listed a bunch of things that offend your sensibilities.

You then posted as though you believe the president doesn't get to define protocol.

Then...



Instead of posting the legal bindings around the protocols that you claimed the president doesn't get to define, you referenced ~240 years of presidents defining protocol.

To translate it into your language.. You claimed the president isn't an office definer and then referenced 240 years of presidential definition.

I think luther views it this way: For 200+ years the President held highest elected office in the country, and those guys always defined the role of the president. However, when Trump was elected, the role of president was downgraded to supreme administrator and caretaker. Obviously Trump in luther's view must carry on Obama's agenda and policies - otherwise, Trump is out of order. An impeachable offense without doubt.

 

[Weezer]

He's at an all time approval rating w/Americans and doesn't need help to beat a stupid old socialist.....or a gay former mayor dude or a former washed up old VP has been who doesn't know what day it is. Those two old hags are not gonna do nothing but go home & make ham & egg sandwiches.

In today's world, why do people feel the need to keep stressing Pete's gay? Does it really bother people that much who he chooses to sleep with? I'm sorry, but that's just ridiculous IMO.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

They do rightfully fear Trumpism. History is rife with examples of why that fear is justified.
It is a dilemma when describing something that is horrendous as horrendous only makes it more horrendous.

 

[NCFisher]

There are reasons they want him to win. Ignore it at your own peril.

Like fooking with Democrats so they wrap up the country with special counsel investigations and impeachments, and oppose everything he attempts to do, and abandon the constitution to try and hang him.

 

[Orange defense]

His name is Seth Rich. You better hope that this story of the DNC, crowd strike, and who killed him doesn’t come out because it’s going to be the end of someone. I promise you this, they won’t be able to kill no one again.

 

[Weezer]

That would imply the debate was informative.
Again, we all know better.

The debate was plenty informative. For someone who puts so much emphasis on Trump's character, I'm surprised you don't give a damn about the character of the person you've already gone on record as saying you'll vote for.

 

[luthervol]

They don’t need to. Every one of them are on record as saying they will vote for anyone over Trump .

I'm certainly on record.
One reason I have no desire to watch them attack each other in a debate.
It's like seeing a player injured during practice the day before the big game.
For me, practice is over, I'm waiting for the game.

 

[Weezer]

His name is Seth Rich. You better hope that this story of the DNC, crowd strike, and who killed him doesn’t come out because it’s going to be the end of someone. I promise you this, they won’t be able to kill no one again.

So you're saying they will be able to kill someone again????

Damn you double negative!!!

 

[0nelilreb]

I'm certainly on record.
One reason I have no desire to watch them attack each other in a debate.
It's like seeing a player injured during practice the day before the big game.
For me, practice is over, I'm waiting for the game.

That’s what I meant , you don’t care who it is or what their polices are .. you only want Trump gone . You can’t take this stance then complain about what the Rs did it 2016 , they wanted Hillary gone .

 

[luthervol]

History is rife with examples? You mean like FDR? You only consider it horrendous because your politics don't match up. Trump hasn't done anything "horrendous". That is just so much hyperbole. He may be an ass of a human being, but he hasn't done anything to the levels you keep trying to claim.

It's a poisoning of mind and spirit. The symptoms appear dormant, but the effects will be long lasting and horribly detrimental.

 

[Orange defense]

So you're saying they will be able to kill someone again????

Damn you double negative!!!

They won’t be able to kill again, they’ll be under the prison.

 

[Weezer]

I'm certainly on record.
One reason I have no desire to watch them attack each other in a debate.
It's like seeing a player injured during practice the day before the big game.
For me, practice is over, I'm waiting for the game.

Just further demonstrates the fallacy of your Trump character argument IMO. Character either matters, or it does not. You're saying you don't really care about the Dems character. That means it's all about politics.