School Shooting in Knoxville

[0nelilreb]

Since some people abuse alcohol and end up hurting/killing others wouldn't it be rational and reasonable to limit how much a person can buy each month or even ban it?

Shut yo mouth before these idiots realize their argument is the same and somehow gets our puppet POTUS and his handlers to sign an EO

 

[luthervol]

For defense was the original purpose.

Defend against whom? People with firearms?
Defend themselves how? By killing their enemy?

 

[luthervol]

80,000 deaths a year seems equitable, fair, and justified so you can feel good for a few minutes.

Society seems to have reached that conclusion.
But society also recognizes the dangers and continually searches for rational and reasonable measures to lessen the negative results.

 

[LouderVol]

Sure it was. Remember, as long as "society" deems it reasonable and rational it is. Society used government force to impose their r&r notions on everyone. For some reason, society then considered repeal of their amendment r&r, so we got that too.

Like you, I am comforted society has a stellar track record with privileges and have no concerns with their limitation on my rights.

Let's not forget that the government poisoned alcohol and left it for people to drink during that time. Because that's the type of government we should all want, the type willing to poison it's own citizens.

 

[luthervol]

And here I thought you believed things changed over time? +/-500 years seems like a reasonable time frame for things to change.

????
The original intent behind the invention of something doesn't change over time.

 

[McDad]

Society seems to have reached that conclusion.
But society also recognizes the dangers and continually searches for rational and reasonable measures to lessen the negative results.

As long as you are at peace with "society" as the scapegoat while you get your buzz on, that's all that really matters.

 

[luthervol]

Think of the fetal-alcohol children, Luther.

Which is why it can be illegal for a pregnant woman to excessively drink. (rational and reasonable)

 

[LouderVol]

Defend against whom? People with firearms?
Defend themselves how? By killing their enemy?

If someone pulls a gun on you, do they need to shoot you to get you to comply?

 

[hog88]

Alcohol is a consumable....BUT even with that important distinction, if they identify a societal problem of people purchasing bulk quantities and then illegally selling, then yea, it would be rational and reasonable.

 

[LouderVol]

????
The original intent behind the invention of something doesn't change over time.

I agree. It was designed to shoot. What people do with it, does change. Try to keep up.

 

[NorthDallas40]

????
The original intent behind the invention of something doesn't change over time.

Thus our founding fathers understood the intent(s) at the time of writing our constitution and chose to restrict the government from infringing on private firearm ownership anyway. Thanks for playing

 

[hog88]

Defend against whom? People with firearms?
Defend themselves how? By killing their enemy?

For the defense of their villages, homes, ext.

 

[McDad]

Which is why it can be illegal for a pregnant woman to excessively drink. (rational and reasonable)

Those like you who purchase support and enable the industry. We must consider only selling wine coolers with .005% alcohol by volume to protect these innocent fetuses (fetii?, fetooses???).

 

[hog88]

Which is why it can be illegal for a pregnant woman to excessively drink. (rational and reasonable)

So you support making it illegal for pregnant women to buy booze?

 

[NorthDallas40]

Seems like a good time to link a definition.

 

[C-south]

I didn't make the rule. You're gonna have to talk to @C-south about that.

I never said collecting guns or even shooting wasn’t a hobby. I said practicing self defense wasn’t.

 

[C-south]

So you support making it illegal for pregnant women to buy booze?

“”Ma’am you need to piss on this stick!”

 

[RockyTop85]

Goes both ways counselor. Not a lot of good faith coming from luther either.

After the last two threads of people misinterpreting linked studies provided by Luther, I think some of you need a refresher on what is bad faith.

 

[OHvol40]

For the defense of their villages, homes, ext.

Lol. dodge, duck, dip, dive, and dodge.

 

[luthervol]

So you support making it illegal for pregnant women to buy booze?

Of course not.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Goes both ways counselor. Not a lot of good faith coming from luther either.

Never mind. Withdrawn on my inference what he was saying.

 

[luthervol]

Those like you who purchase support and enable the industry. We must consider only selling wine coolers with .005% alcohol by volume to protect these innocent fetuses (fetii?, fetooses???).

You can keep pushing the analogy, but it's not working.

 

[hog88]

Lol. dodge, duck, dip, dive, and dodge.

Not dodging a thing. Someone came up with a better widget.

 

[hog88]

Of course not.

Why not? If you support making it a crime for them to drink while pregnant why not remove the temptation and make it illegal for them to buy it?

 

[hog88]

You can keep pushing the analogy, but it's not working.

It's better than any you have come up with.