IPorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2007
- Messages
- 25,545
- Likes
- 47
My God, this thread went to hell.
Oklahoma has an inferior football tradition, Georgia Tech doesn't care about football, and Tennessee could never be both a basketball and football school...
It's a self-written insult. Three separate fan bases from three separate conferences are laughing at this crap.
I believe the question is which team has a more storied history, not which team is "better" or plays in a "better" conference. The SEC has not always been the dominant machine that it is now. I like UT much more than Oklahoma. Love UT football actually.... But OU has the history. Some numbers:
UT stat guru's, if any of these are wrong please correct. Internet stats are not always correct.
National Titles
Oklahoma- 7 (4 since 1970)
Tennessee- 4 (2 since 1950)
All time wins ( as of DEC 5 2008)
Oklahoma- 791
Tennessee- 775
Conference Titles
Oklahoma- 34*
Tennessee- 13 SEC titles 6 SEC east titles
* the 34 titles represents BIG12 titles AND division titles all in one.
If you don't want to concede that OU has a bigger history, then at least call them equal.
Edit: its also ridiculous to be discussing this in a basketball thread that got hi-jacked.
As long as UT continues to extend its winning streak over UK in football, you should not try to argue about sports with me.
I'm not trying to argue with you imbecile, I gave you specific facts which are nailed in concrete. Thats not an arguement.
Furthermore, deflecting the debate totally by bringing up UK football history shows that you have no interest whatsoever in talking or debating rationally, and are completely inept and void of any form of intelligent conversation, as EVERYONE in this thread has already noted. Get out of your parents basement and see the world.
You are now on my ignore list as well. Have fun.
Why does Calapari being at Kentucky make him a better coach? Pearl beat Memphis twice in the last 3 years, did he not?
Anyone who can't agree that UT will never be a basketball school, Oklahoma is one of two programs in the entire nation with a signifiant history in football and basketball, and GT allowed Rudey Ruetigger to sack its quarterback know nothing about sports. Oklahoma and Ohio State are the only schools in the nation who can claim their men's basketball and football teams have more tradition the UT's.
What in the world does that have to do with ANYTHING? Letting a scrub sack their QB in the final moments of a game that was long over means GT has no meaningful football tradition? How old are you, 12?
Hey UT lost to a 3 win Memphis team on national TV in 1996 that knocked them out of a major bowl, and it's considered one of the biggest upsets ever. I guess that means UT's football program sucks too.
Besides, you changed the argument. You started everything by stating GT fans don't care about their football program, and once again, no matter how you spin it, that's flat out false, because GT is a football school first. Nobody has said one freakin' word about GT having more tradition or a better program. You changed it into that argument.
Geez....
I wouldn't describe those particular teams as "great." Those teams were on serious down years when they lost those games.
To be far "more" intelligent means that it was intelligent before you used the ignore function.