Senators set to vote on bill to codify Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage protections

[C-south]

And ones that want to ban everything in sight to coddle their feelings.

Nobody is promoting a marriage ban.

 

[C-south]

Not in Tennessee
It was on the ballot this time

To redefine it or remove it from an antiquated law?….that isn’t practiced.

 

[Orangeslice13]

To redefine it or remove it from an antiquated law?….that isn’t practiced.

Nope. Guess again

 

[zeppelin128]

Lol. That’s always your go to. Everyone shouldn’t be expected to normalize sodomy and mental illness.

You just proved my point with this idiotic post.

 

[Septic]

If only it were a vote to get government completely out of the marriage business.

Agree.

Everyone shouldn’t be expected to normalize sodomy and mental illness.

Is someone asking you to agree with it, like it or accept it?

 

[zeppelin128]

So not the actual majority opinion, or even the opinion of the minority…but rather the opinion of 1 justice?

Is that not important? It isn't like there are 150 Supreme Court Justices. In a group of nine, one opinion definitely matters.

 

[C-south]

You just proved my point with this idiotic post.

What wasn’t true about it?

 

[Septic]

And ones that want to ban everything in sight to coddle their feelings.

He's telling on himself. In one post he says "gEt gUBm3Nt OuT oF MaAIREGE BizNesS" then evolves into "WHy sHUld w3 n0rMILiZe dIS?"

 

[C-south]

Is that not important? It isn't like there are 150 Supreme Court Justices. In a group of nine, one opinion definitely matters.

Luckily at least one can’t define a man or a woman.

 

[C-south]

He's telling on himself. In one post he says "gEt gUBm3Nt OuT oF MaAIREGE BizNesS" then evolves into "WHy sHUld w3 n0rMILiZe dIS?"

Get government out and it isn’t an issue. Until then…

 

[volfanhill]

Way too many people need a blow job in this thread

 

[zeppelin128]

Nobody is promoting a marriage ban.

That's a lie.

 

[Septic]

Get government out and it isn’t an issue. Until then…

Pick a lane man.

Don't lament and grouse about the .gov inserting itself into the conversation and then try to hide behind it.

 

[Vol since 77]

I’d argue that gay people are sick of having the religious right and the rights Fed up interpretation of sin shoved down their throats.
But I digress

What about folks like myself, which can't stand both groups and just want to be left alone without any of it shoved in my face? Guess I'm s.o.l. which is why I can't stand both sides equally

 

[tvolsfan]

What about folks like myself, which can't stand both groups and just want to be left alone without any of it shoved in my face? Guess I'm s.o.l. which is why I can't stand both sides equally

I’m pretty sure that would still be sexual assault, so you’re good.

 

[Vol since 77]

I’m pretty sure that would still be sexual assault, so you’re good.

Lol

 

[C-south]

Pick a lane man.

Don't lament and grouse about the .gov inserting itself into the conversation and then try to hide behind it.

Wth are you even talking about? Get the government out of it. If they don’t it shouldn’t change what it is currently. Adding more handouts to the dole is stupid regardless of a few mentally ill folks feelings.

 

[tvolsfan]

It’s only a matter of time before the Marxists weaponize the gay agenda to turn C-south’s grandchildren.

 

[volgr]

Always odd that the "liberty and freedom" right-wing types are the first to say, "wait, not like that!!"

Is that you, Stefan Molyneux?

 

[Septic]

Wth are you even talking about? Get the government out of it. If they don’t it shouldn’t change what it is currently. Adding more handouts to the dole is stupid regardless of a few mentally ill folks feelings.

I'm curious, how exactly do you think granting the rights of marriage to gay couples diminish the existing rights of heterosexual couples?

Specifically.

 

[C-south]

That's a lie.

Marriage already exists and nobody is wanting to change it aside from getting government involvement out of it. There are plenty that don’t want to redefine it to coddle feelings regardless if government is involved or not.

 

[C-south]

I'm curious, how exactly do you think granting the rights to gay couples diminish the existing rights of heterosexual couples?

Specifically.

What rights do they not have considering marriage isn’t a right?

 

[Vol8188]

Is that not important? It isn't like there are 150 Supreme Court Justices. In a group of nine, one opinion definitely matters.

Not if it’s 8-1

 

[Septic]

What rights do they not have considering marriage isn’t a right?

Ah word games.

Let me rephrase.

I'm curious, how exactly do you think granting the protections to gay couples diminishes the existing protections of heterosexual couples?

 

[volgr]

You are 100% allowed to be a bigot and define marriage as you wish. The fact you want to codify said bigotry and hatred into law is the issue.

Has nothing to do with bigotry or hatred.