Senators set to vote on bill to codify Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage protections

[EasternVol]

Wait until the push to supporting polygamy and pedophilia

Deja vu all over again. What's wrong with polygamy if it's between consenting adults?

 

[PEPPERJAX]

Deja vu all over again. What's wrong with polygamy if it's between consenting adults?

Multiple menstrual cycles in the same house.

 

[EasternVol]

Multiple menstrual cycles in the same house.

Separate houses works much better

 

[EasternVol]

Should they dole out SS and Medicare to each of the wives?

It can be pro-rated.

 

[utvolpj]

Should they dole out SS and Medicare to each of the wives?

$0 for this a well. For everyone

 

[zeppelin128]

This was a procedural vote to move the bill to the floor of the Senate for debate, amendments, etc. The final vote tally was 62-37.

 

[zeppelin128]

I’m not convinced you read it. Go ahead. What do you mean

I have. Take another look at Clarence Thomas's concurrent opinion in Dodd.

 

[zeppelin128]

Whole lot of "freedom for me, but not for thee" going on in this thread. This is all pretty simple really: if you or your church doesn't like or support gay or interracial marriage, then don't have one.

 

[C-south]

Whole lot of "freedom for me, but not for thee" going on in this thread. This is all pretty simple really: if you or your church doesn't like or support gay or interracial marriage, then don't have one.

Or recognize the definition of marriage.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Whole lot of "freedom for me, but not for thee" going on in this thread. This is all pretty simple really: if you or your church doesn't like or support gay or interracial marriage, then don't have one.

I really don’t get it.
I’m guessing Errbody missed the worry about the plank in your own eye ……lesson.

 

[n_huffhines]

In my life, I have only experienced one homosexual

You dog, you

 

[n_huffhines]

Deja vu all over again. What's wrong with polygamy if it's between consenting adults?

Nothing

 

[zeppelin128]

I really don’t get it.
I’m guessing Errbody missed the worry about the plank in your own eye ……lesson.

Always odd that the "liberty and freedom" right-wing types are the first to say, "wait, not like that!!"

 

[Orangeslice13]

Always odd that the "liberty and freedom" right-wing types are the first to say, "wait, not like that!!"

Hurrah for hypocrisy

 

[zeppelin128]

Or recognize the definition of marriage.

You are 100% allowed to be a bigot and define marriage as you wish. The fact you want to codify said bigotry and hatred into law is the issue.

 

[C-south]

Always odd that the "liberty and freedom" right-wing types are the first to say, "wait, not like that!!"

Then there’s those that want to redefine everything to coddle their feelings.

 

[C-south]

You are 100% allowed to be a bigot and define marriage as you wish. The fact you want to codify said bigotry and hatred into law is the issue.

I didn’t define marriage. It was defined thousands of years ago.

 

[Orangeslice13]

You are 100% allowed to be a bigot and define marriage as you wish. The fact you want to codify said bigotry and hatred into law is the issue.

Hold on…. Let’s let him define it anyway he wants. But first let’s make it illegal to consider marriage in any way for taxes, insurance, pretty much anything.

Problem solved

 

[Orangeslice13]

I didn’t define marriage. It was defined thousands of years ago.

So was slavery.
Just because it was defined for thousands of years doesn’t make it right for today

 

[C-south]

You are 100% allowed to be a bigot and define marriage as you wish. The fact you want to codify said bigotry and hatred into law is the issue.

Lol. That’s always your go to. Everyone shouldn’t be expected to normalize sodomy and mental illness.

 

[C-south]

So was slavery.
Just because it was defined for thousands of years doesn’t make it right for today

Slavery still holds the same definition.

 

[Septic]

Wait until the push to supporting polygamy and pedophilia

My god, you are intellectually lazy.

 

[zeppelin128]

Then there’s those that want to redefine everything to coddle their feelings.

And ones that want to ban everything in sight to coddle their feelings.

 

[Vol8188]

I have. Take another look at Clarence Thomas's concurrent opinion in Dodd.

So not the actual majority opinion, or even the opinion of the minority…but rather the opinion of 1 justice?

 

[Orangeslice13]

Slavery still holds the same definition.

Not in Tennessee
It was on the ballot this time