September 10, 2024 Presidential Debate Thread. (Insert snarky subtitles here.)

#1,826
#1,826
BowlBrother85 said:
The "whistleblower" is not alleging that the Harris campaign received questions ahead of the debate. It is only alleged that certain topics would be off-limits. That is obviously not the same thing as receiving questions that were later asked.
Click to expand...
image-83.png

As to how smart I am? Well clearly smart enough to read page 3.

jules-speak-english-in-what.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and LSU-SIU
#1,829
#1,829
Sgt_Nick_Fury said:
View attachment 677490

As to how smart I am? Well clearly smart enough to read page 3.

View attachment 677491
Click to expand...
Like I've said before .... Let me know when either Fox News or House Republicans start talking about this story of yours. If it can be verified as authentic, then they will, or at least opinion show hosts Sean Hannity and Jesse Watters definitely will along with kooks like Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene in the House. They will not just sit on such a bombshell damaging story as this would be, so close to the election.

So, there is really no further point in talking about it. We have the test .... Will Fox News and House Republicans start pushing this, or ignore it? Because we all know that they won't ignore it, if it's legitimate. The fact that they haven't already, should tell you something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
#1,830
#1,830
Vol8188 said:
Beyond that. It’s an outright lie about one of the most important issues this election cycle.

She was also allowed to get away with lying and claiming Trump wishes to ban all abortions.

Two massive issues this election. 0 fact checks.
Click to expand...
Trump can't catch a break!
 
#1,833
#1,833
BernardKingGOAT said:
It was obvious. Still, had nothing to do with him taking the bait like a young, petulant teenager. It's too damn funny 😂
Click to expand...

So the excuse for not fact checking her is “it was obvious”?

That sounds like the easiest kind of lie to fact check. And it wasn’t obvious to 100% of voters
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#1,834
#1,834
#1,835
#1,835
BowlBrother85 said:
How do you go about fact-checking someone on an issue in which they have literally endorsed every possible angle at one time or another?


Click to expand...

Kamala is no different in that regard. She’s shifted positions but wasn’t fact checked numerous times like Trump was. If you’re going to call out one, call out the other. That’s not what ABC did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and LSU-SIU
#1,836
#1,836
BisonVol said:
Kamala is no different in that regard. She’s shifted positions but wasn’t fact checked numerous times like Trump was. If you’re going to call out one, call out the other. That’s not what ABC did.
Click to expand...

Doesn't the affidavit even specify that particular part?

As far as I can see, if the affidavit was signed when it was supposedly was.... complete criminal or civil fraud.
 
#1,837
#1,837
BernardKingGOAT said:
You seem like a guy that likes to have a good time. That you continue to rip off these lengthy posts trying to convince someone, who will never see your point, to change their mind is a huge waste of your time. You must be aware of it. Surely that isn't sport for you. Facking with them is sport. You damn well should know you're not changing anyone's mind. Smoke a bowl instead. Then just fack with them and have fun with it
Click to expand...
Again, sometimes it's good to remember this is board is extremely right wing, with a good amount of posters simply being far right.
 
#1,843
#1,843
LSU-SIU said:
Doesn't the affidavit even specify that particular part?

As far as I can see, if the affidavit was signed when it was supposedly was.... complete criminal or civil fraud.
Click to expand...
If the affidavit and it's contents are legitimate ... then House Republicans and Fox News will talk about it. If they don't? Then this was a fabricated story. Nobody is going to believe that Sean Hannity would pass on a story as big as this, after covering the Seth Rich case as aggressively as he did. Nor is anyone going to believe that a Q Anon believer like Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene is going to ignore it either. If they do? Then it's obviously BS.
 
#1,845
#1,845
BowlBrother85 said:
If the affidavit and it's contents are legitimate ... then House Republicans and Fox News will talk about it. If they don't? Then this was a fabricated story. Nobody is going to believe that Sean Hannity would pass on a story as big as this, after covering the Seth Rich case as aggressively as he did. Nor is anyone going to believe that a Q Anon believer like Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene is going to ignore it either. If they do? Then it's obviously BS.
Click to expand...

You literally had a President on national TV admit to murdering Americans and nobody cares. So, no.... that doesn't mean that at all.
 
#1,846
#1,846
LSU-SIU said:
You literally had a President on national TV admit to murdering Americans and nobody cares. So, no.... that doesn't mean that at all.
Click to expand...
If you are saying that Fox News, especially their opinion show hosts, would sit on an ABC whistleblower story regarding the Presidential debate being rigged? And there aren't any House Republicans who would publicly talk about such a story either? Then you are an idiot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
#1,847
#1,847
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and Sea Ray
#1,848
#1,848
BowlBrother85 said:
If you are saying that Fox News, especially their opinion show hosts, would sit on an ABC whistleblower story regarding the Presidential debate being rigged? And there aren't any House Republicans who would publicly talk about such a story either? Then you are an idiot.
Click to expand...

I couldn't say on any particular thing, but generally Fox News is just controlled opposition. That is why they have to get rid of certain host/casters, even the popular ones. They can't stray to far from the plantation.

Its all the illusion of choice, the problem is the gags aren't really working anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#1,849
#1,849
Vol8188 said:
At no point has he ever claimed he’d back a national abortion ban. None of those articles make that claim
Click to expand...
Click on the second link. As President, he did back a federal abortion ban. We have had this discussion before. I get tired of posting the same damn things over and over again.
 
#1,850
#1,850
LSU-SIU said:
I couldn't say on any particular thing, but generally Fox News is just controlled opposition. That is why they have to get rid of certain host/casters, even the popular ones. They can't stray to far from the plantation.
Click to expand...
That is bull $hit. Sean Hannity is as much in Trump's corner as anyone at ABC is for Harris.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top