September 10, 2024 Presidential Debate Thread. (Insert snarky subtitles here.)

Lol what a clown. Guy claims to have proof Harris got questions in advance. Then produces that? Lol

So campaigns that negotiate aspects of every single minute detail of the debates negotiated 3 areas that were off topic and that is "giving questions in advance"....
 

LOL.

Looks legit .... because a true whistleblower who works for ABC News, is going to take this bombshell major news story to little known social media personalities such as "Black Insurrectionist" and "Phillip Anderson" rather than going to a major media outlet such as Fox News, where their information would actually be seen?

As I have said before .... Let me know when Fox News starts covering this "story," because they definitely will if it's legitimate. They are in Trump's corner and would love to take down ABC News, as well. Thus far, they have ignored this, just like everyone else has.

Get some common sense, man.
 
So campaigns that negotiate aspects of every single minute detail of the debates negotiated 3 areas that were off topic and that is "giving questions in advance"....
Upon closer look, that is true. This supposed "whistleblower" isn't even alleging that ABC News gave the Harris campaign questions in advance. They are only alleging that some topics were off limits to questions .... but that was probably the case with the Trump campaign as well. That is customary in debates. From who gets the first question to who gets the last question, everything is negotiated. Even if what is being alleged is true ..... it's still nothing. Good lord.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
Upon closer look, that is true. This supposed "whistleblower" isn't even alleging that ABC News gave the Harris campaign questions in advance. They are only alleging that some topics were off limits to questions .... but that was probably the case with the Trump campaign as well. That is customary in debates. From who gets the first question to who gets the last question, everything is negotiated. Even if what is being alleged is true ..... it's still nothing. Good lord.

There was nothing about Stormy, Access Hollywood, nothing about the civil fraud, Smith cases, etc....

They negotiated the size of the podiums...
 
That "Clinton Insider" bit means nothing .... Why would a legitimate whistleblower with such bombshell information choose these people as conduits? It makes no sense. An ABC whistleblower is taking this to Fox News.

This is straight from the far-right playbook for how to jumpstart a conspiracy theory .... Just pay attention to whether or not any of the legitimate right-wing media outlets pick this up. My guess is, that Fox News will never mention this, but that won't stop your type from believing every word of it anyway. You are exactly why these conspiracy theories begin and why they work. You want to believe it .... and so you do. The MAGA crowd never even needs to see the proof. The allegation itself is enough.



 

The "whistleblower" is not alleging that the Harris campaign received questions ahead of the debate. It is only alleged that certain topics would be off-limits. That is obviously not the same thing as receiving questions that were later asked.

As a part of debate negotiations, it is standard practice, that "rules" will be established concerning what is off-limits by both campaigns. It is highly likely that the Trump campaign was assured that there would be no questions asked regarding the civil judgments against him or the investigation into his handling of classified documents. Those topics, were conspicuously, not addressed during the debate either.

You must have noticed that Fox News is still not covering this "major story" .... You should be intelligent enough to figure out for yourself why that is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
The "whistleblower" is not alleging that the Harris campaign received questions ahead of the debate. It is only alleged that certain topics would be off-limits. That is obviously not the same thing as receiving questions that were later asked.

As a part of debate negotiations, it is standard practice, that "rules" will be established concerning what is off-limits by both campaigns. It is highly likely that the Trump campaign was assured that there would be no questions asked regarding the civil judgments against him or the investigation into his handling of classified documents. Those topics, were conspicuously, not addressed during the debate either.

You must have noticed that Fox News is still not covering this "major story" .... You should be intelligent enough to figure out for yourself why that is.
You seem like a guy that likes to have a good time. That you continue to rip off these lengthy posts trying to convince someone, who will never see your point, to change their mind is a huge waste of your time. You must be aware of it. Surely that isn't sport for you. Facking with them is sport. You damn well should know you're not changing anyone's mind. Smoke a bowl instead. Then just fack with them and have fun with it
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
You seem like a guy that likes to have a good time. That you continue to rip off these lengthy posts trying to convince someone, who will never see your point, to change their mind is a huge waste of your time. You must be aware of it. Surely that isn't sport for you. Facking with them is sport. You damn well should know you're not changing anyone's mind. Smoke a bowl instead. Then just fack with them and have fun with it
LOL!
 
OK, so if they were fair, why didn't they fact check this outright lie?

"As of today, there is not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone, in any war zone around the world, the first time this century,” - Kamala

Also claimed she had never opposed fracking
 

VN Store



Back
Top