You want a guy named head coach in waiting that's never been to a super regional and has played a role in 2 staffs getting fired.
That's a stretch for sure
If we hire leggett and he wants to join him then he can be considered as his replacement if he takes us to Omaha like all the rest of the assistant coaches that have made that jump
Just to be clear Bruin, I said "in grooming". I know it probably appears to be the same as "in waiting" but I used that term instead in order to differentiate it. I wouldn't set it up as a for sure plan, because I don't like that anyway. You probably get politicking going on behind the scenes when a HCIW is getting antsy. He would be an assistant, maybe assoc HC with the potential to prove himself as HC material, like you said. If 6 years from now we're still missing the NCAA, barely making Hoover and the offense and recruiting aren't up to par, then no way he gets the nod.
I enjoy your post a lot.
Good discussion.
I just want someone with some proven recruiting ties to somewhere that doesn't get the door slammed in their face and can get kids to come. Serrano's Cali ties are probably 2nd to none and Cali has great ball players. But we're not gonna assemble a team of 15 of them so does it do much good? I have little doubt he could win again out there.
U of Louisville's roster may suggest another route. Less than half of their roster is from Kentucky.
Except for one player from Texas, everyone else on the roster is from somewhere north or west of Louisville. Many aren't from areas we consider talent rich, but they are from areas where the best prospects are willing to come south to play in a top tier program in a top tier conference.
I'd be open to a mid major coach from somewhere a little bit north of us. Someone who can stake a claim to the best recruits in a region where they don't shiver when they think of playing baseball in Knoxville in February.
If that coach had major conference experience, such as a four year starter on a national championship team, so much the better.
If that coach had proven he was ready for a bigger challenge by taking a team without much of a winning tradition and building it to the point that it totally owns his conference, so much the better.
If the coach has done it with players who aren't from areas owned by other SEC teams, so much the better.
If that coach was still pretty young, say mid-30's, so much the better.
If that coach is currently paid so far below SEC scale that anything we pay will seem like a fortune, so much the better.
Greg Lovelady, Wright State.
Lovelady played at Miami where he won a couple of national championships. He was a volunteer at Miami for a couple of seasons. The only shortcoming on his resume is having only 3 years as a head coach but the guy has been around quality baseball people his entire career. Would not be surprised if Purdue tries to make a play for him.
Better fit at Purdue for sure. Are they making a change for sure?
Where was he before being a HC at wright state?
I would be shocked if Purdue is not making a change. They won 45 games in 2012, upgraded their facility and have been awful ever since. They are currently 7-42.
Lovelady was an assistant at Wright State under Rob Cooper (current Penn St HC and good friend of CDS) for I think around 9 years. He has future Big Ten HC written all over him, but UT should give him a hard look if there is an opening.
Enjoy the talk
Wouldn't Purdue go after their assistant that recruited that team that was so good?
Since he left to go to kent state it all fell apart. I forget his name
Thanks for posting 66
Who are those yahoos?
Very little knowledge on that panel
I would be shocked if Purdue is not making a change. They won 45 games in 2012, upgraded their facility and have been awful ever since. They are currently 7-42.
Lovelady was an assistant at Wright State under Rob Cooper (current Penn St HC and good friend of CDS) for I think around 9 years. He has future Big Ten HC written all over him, but UT should give him a hard look if there is an opening.
ATM, I have no real idea what they are going to do. And listening to Pennington and his panel of experts, I feel I know even less.
If they are going to get someone else, they need to do due diligence, and make the right hire. But thinking from the financial concerns, is Tennessee willing to make that kind of investment? If they were willing to build the stadium, I think they should.
I feel if they keep Serrano, they need to take a hard look at giving him some better support, if that is the problem. We have local kids choosing Vanderbilt? I find something seriously wrong with this picture. Regardless of the sport.