BowlBrother85
1 star recruit
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 44,186
- Likes
- 38,550
Gingrich has been out in the wilderness since 2008, how is that not well known? Great guy but he's playing a ratings game here. Fox slipped hard to #3 and it's a good rebound strategy because there appears to be some interest in the story judging by this board, and he's not going to be forced to validate any of his claims.
I think they know that they are above the law and act accordingly. They are evil people and you can't comprehend that because you blindly follow them. Podesta has emails talking about going to Satanic dinner parties disguised as "art pieces." I think it says more about your character, or lack thereof.
It's funny that it takes a column from a conservative blog to draw attention to the absurdity of this story but this is the only one I see making the rounds that sticks to the facts. Most sites aren't dignifying this theory with a response. Hannity is making a fool of himself just like he did with the welfare rancher Cliven Bundy. He doesn't care anything about this murdered guy or his family. He just has his own selfish interests and political agenda.
Word vomit. This was an assassination. Assange has all but said Seth Rich was his source for the DNC emails. Ignoring nearly all the facts of the case means you seem to be the one trying to reconcile this with your own political agenda. There is more than enough weird stuff surrounding his death that should give you pause, yet this is all just some super weird coincidence with nothing puzzling what so ever.
Word vomit. This was an assassination. Assange has all but said Seth Rich was his source for the DNC emails. Ignoring nearly all the facts of the case means you seem to be the one trying to reconcile this with your own political agenda. There is more than enough weird stuff surrounding his death that should give you pause, yet this is all just some super weird coincidence with nothing puzzling what so ever.
Yeah, I can see why someone like yourself (who also believes in Pizzagate) would take the word of Julian Assange over the word of the Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence (James Clapper). Of course, there aren't any members of Congress (including Republicans) disputing their findings either. They have seen the intelligence whereas you and I have not. The Department of Homeland Security has no political agenda here where Julian Assange obviously does.
You are the one ignoring the facts because this is what you want to believe.
Word vomit. This was an assassination. Assange has all but said Seth Rich was his source for the DNC emails. Ignoring nearly all the facts of the case means you seem to be the one trying to reconcile this with your own political agenda. There is more than enough weird stuff surrounding his death that should give you pause, yet this is all just some super weird coincidence with nothing puzzling what so ever.
Yeah, I can see why someone like yourself (who also believes in Pizzagate) would take the word of Julian Assange over the word of the Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence (James Clapper). Of course, there aren't any members of Congress (including Republicans) disputing their findings either. They have seen the intelligence whereas you and I have not. The Department of Homeland Security has no political agenda here where Julian Assange obviously does.
You are the one ignoring the facts because this is what you want to believe.
Come on, I bet a lot of robberies end with the victim being shot in the back and nothing stolen from them.
Come on, I bet a lot of robberies end with the victim being shot in the back and nothing stolen from them.
Taking Assange's word for it? You mean the guy who has leaked 10 million plus documents and never had one disputed? Yeah, I'll take his word for it.
On the topic of pizzagate or Seth Rich, if I understand you correctly, as long as one applies the label "conspiracy theory" on something, one is then allowed to ignore anything and everything about it that doesn't align with his political world view? That's how you are acting about these issues. Not even a modest dose of healthy skepticism? You just swallow all the victory gin without even giving it a second thought?
Taking Assange's word for it? You mean the guy who has leaked 10 million plus documents and never had one disputed? Yeah, I'll take his word for it.
On the topic of pizzagate or Seth Rich, if I understand you correctly, as long as one applies the label "conspiracy theory" on something, one is then allowed to ignore anything and everything about it that doesn't align with his political world view? That's how you are acting about these issues. Not even a modest dose of healthy skepticism? You just swallow all the victory gin without even giving it a second thought?
Nobody will know the motive behind the murder until the assailant is apprehended (and even then there is no guarantee that it will be evident). Has the possibility that the investigating authorities know what the hell they're doing crossed your mind? This is stupid.
The guy who is clearly anti-American and was charged with a sexual assault. If his word means more to you than the words of the Department of Homeland Security and James Clapper and every member of the United States Congress... then you will simply believe anything that diverts and deflects bad publicity away from Donald Trump.
Why would wikileaks put up a 20K reward for this guy? Do they do that for every person killed in DC or anytime a DNC staffer gets killed?
I hate Trump you blithering retard! Wtf does Trump have to do with this?
Really? Because Wikileaks wants the same thing the Russians want. Chaos in America. They are trying to promote doubt in the findings of our intelligence agencies. This is the definition of fake news which James Clapper was referring to in his testimony before Congress on January 6th which Trump later hijacked and bastardized into something else.
Really? Because Wikileaks wants the same thing the Russians want. Chaos in America. They are trying to promote doubt in the findings of our intelligence agencies. This is the definition of fake news which James Clapper was referring to in his testimony before Congress on January 6th which Trump later hijacked and bastardized into something else.