Shooting in Las Vegas @ Jason Aldean Concert

Agree. I have several AKs and ARs plus many handguns and would never shoot anyone. They are mostly for sport unless I absolutely have to defend myself and my family.

The 2nd Amendment is there to defend ourselves from a tyrannous Government. Don't let libs redefine the 2nd Amendment. Most of them don't have a clue about guns. Most will say clip instead of magazine, use the term bullets instead of rounds, or don't understand the difference in a Select Fire or Full Auto, or understand the difference between a Semi-Auto AK vs a SEMI-Auto 22, etc. Yet they want to try and make laws on which rifles\guns are bad or should not be owned by a law abiding citizen such as myself.

Good luck fighting off tyrannous govt drones with your small armory.
 
Good luck fighting off tyrannous govt drones with your small armory.

It doesn't work that way. Again libs do not understand.

What is more likely to happen is the government fails and rule of law breaks down. Police are not available to protect you and you will have to protect yourself. You can look at many examples all over the world. Our military has seen many examples of this all over the world. It happens. It's how governments are overthrown. Venezuela is going through this very thing. People are starving and will do anything to survive. Many professional women (Doctors, Lawyers, etc) have turned to prostitution just to survive. Many are helpless and have no way to defend themselves.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't work that way. Again libs do not understand.

What is more likely to happen is the government fails and rule of law breaks down. Police are not available to protect you and you will have to protect yourself. You can look at many examples all over the world. Our military has seen many examples of this all over the world. It happens. It's how governments are overthrown. Venezuela is going through this very thing. People are starving and will do anything to survive. Many professional women (Doctors, Lawyers, etc) have turned to prostitution just to survive. Many are helpless and have no way to defend themselves.

You are the one that mentioned defending against a tyrannous government. Now you are changing the context to fit your argument.

Do you know what the first 3 words of the 2nd Ammendment are?
 
You are the one that mentioned defending against a tyrannous government. Now you are changing the context to fit your argument.

Do you know what the first 3 words of the 2nd Ammendment are?

Again you don't understand. Venezuela is a Tyrannous Government. What happened after the fact? It has failed and rule of law is failing and people are not protected. Get a clue.
 
Agree. I have several AKs and ARs plus many handguns and would never shoot anyone. They are mostly for sport unless I absolutely have to defend myself and my family.

The 2nd Amendment is there to defend ourselves from a tyrannous Government. Don't let libs redefine the 2nd Amendment. Most of them don't have a clue about guns. Most will say clip instead of magazine, use the term bullets instead of rounds, or don't understand the difference in a Select Fire or Full Auto, or understand the difference between a Semi-Auto AK vs a SEMI-Auto 22, etc. Yet they want to try and make laws on which rifles\guns are bad or should not be owned by a law abiding citizen such as myself.

Serious question. Why do you need even one AK or AR, let alone several of each? The fact that you're a responsible gun owner is immaterial.
 
Serious question. Why do you need even one AK or AR, let alone several of each? The fact that you're a responsible gun owner is immaterial.

Libs always ask that question as a gotcha question. How about the fact that it is my Constitutional Right to do so? It's not always about need. Why does someone need 2 cars when one will do? Why does some need 2 homes when one will do? Why does someone need several outfits to wear when a few will do? Why do women need lots of purses and shoes? It's America.

Ask a car collector why he needs so many cars? Same answer.
 
Serious question. Why do you need even one AK or AR, let alone several of each? The fact that you're a responsible gun owner is immaterial.

Right of gun ownership isn’t limited by the constitution to home protection and duck hunting. It gives the right to form a militia to protect against foreign invaders or against an oppressive government, should the need arise.
 
Serious question. Why do you need even one AK or AR, let alone several of each? The fact that you're a responsible gun owner is immaterial.

Need has nothing to do with it. Does anyone need a car capable of doing 200mph?
 
Right of gun ownership isn’t limited by the constitution to home protection and duck hunting. It gives the right to form a militia to protect against foreign invaders or against an oppressive government, should the need arise.

What are the first 3 words of the 2nd Amendment?
 
Libs always ask that question as a gotcha question. How about the fact that it is my Constitutional Right to do so? It's not always about need. Why does someone need 2 cars when one will do? Why does some need 2 homes when one will do? Why does someone need several outfits to wear when a few will do? Why do women need lots of purses and shoes? It's America.

Ask a car collector why he needs so many cars? Same answer.

I’m sorry. I must have also missed the last time somebody shot 500+ people from 1200 yards away with their new outfit or their second house or their car collection.
 
Personally, I don't have a problem with gun ownership. My kids go hunting with their grandpa and my step-daughter just hit the gun range this weekend with her boyfriend.

However, I feel we should do something and everything should be on the table. Tighter gun control laws should not automatically be dismissed just because we're scared of political ideology. Initial indications are that this idiot bought these guns illegally. If that's the case the enforcing the current gun laws isn't the issue.

Compromise people. Our country needs to learn to compromise. I suggest we take a lesson from Mr. Potato head. He's to two eyes, two ears, and one mouth. We all need to stop talking and start listening.

Just my opinion folks...not looking to offend anyone here so take it for what it's worth.
 
Personally, I don't have a problem with gun ownership. My kids go hunting with their grandpa and my step-daughter just hit the gun range this weekend with her boyfriend.

However, I feel we should do something and everything should be on the table. Tighter gun control laws should not automatically be dismissed just because we're scared of political ideology. Initial indications are that this idiot bought these guns illegally. If that's the case the enforcing the current gun laws isn't the issue.

Compromise people. Our country needs to learn to compromise. I suggest we take a lesson from Mr. Potato head. He's to two eyes, two ears, and one mouth. We all need to stop talking and start listening.

Just my opinion folks...not looking to offend anyone here so take it for what it's worth.

We need to be looking at the over prescription of anti-depressants and other mood altering drugs. Address the holes in HIPPA that prevent reporting of mental illness to the registries that the instant BGC uses.
 
“A Well Regulated....”

That does not read as carte blanche to me.

I know the first three words. So you're arguing we don't have the right to own guns? Or that we better get to work better regulating a citizen militia?
 
We need to be looking at the over prescription of anti-depressants and other mood altering drugs. Address the holes in HIPPA that prevent reporting of mental illness to the registries that the instant BGC uses.

correct - and gun control laws. Like I said, I think everything should be on the table.
 

VN Store



Back
Top