Eric, whats happened to you since the coaching change? You were fine while CLK was here. Since DD was hired it seems like you think your primary goal is defending Dooleys every move. Calling people out for not thinking hell succeed and not blindly supporting our coach. The thing is, we just hired a 17-20 coach from the WAC, why you question people who dont think hell succeed is beyond me. Logic says Dooley will never win it all. If he succeeds great, but the chances based on his track record and what hes done and said so far lead me to believe hell be a poor mans Mike Shula.
Now call me a troll and ask why I have a USC logo, go ahead. Head over to the basketball forum, I laugh at the Anti-Pearls all day and love the direction of the program. All I care about is winning and Pearl has shown hell do that, and I believe based on what I saw of his recruiting and gameplanning ability Kiffin wouldve won too. Almost nothing Dooley has done has impressed me. He retained two good coaches and hired an excellent coach in Baggett, and what I believe will be an excellent hire in Heistand. However, other than that he hasnt done anything that will slightly improve the program. He has made some very poor decisions staff wise (not just coaches) and has not shown he is SEC ready when it comes to handling recruiting IMO.
Secondly, Ive been an SC fan my whole life because I was born in LA. I moved to Knoxville and as a child and am a much bigger Vol fan. However, SC is my second team so to speak and CLK did nothing to change that.