did any of those 19 get docked 1.5 million and suspended 8 games before the NCAA ruled. Also, did any of those 19 come clean immediately after their lie? Are we part of the 5% or the 95%? I think there is a good chance shes different.
We may be different, but those aren't odds I want to play. And I doubt an 8 game suspension and some cash would prevent a show cause. Maybe reduce it from two years to one, but it's not nearly as severe a penalty. Still, not the kind of odds I want to play.
He gives good hints
MH knows the situation better, and he deals with the SEC and NCAA on a daily basis. Don't think he'd have kept CBP around this long and through all of the scrutiny if his people were telling him a show cause is likely.
Well, I suppose, given all the media stuff that's been put out, all the forum stuff, and looking up history of what the NCAA has done in similar situations in the past, most could make a pretty accurate guess at what will happen.
But I repeat, no one KNOWS but the NCAA and POSSIBLY MH and / or CBP.
And the NCAA probably does not have a final ruling since UT still has a 'day in court' so to speak. If they did, it would be pre-judging wouldn't it ?
Well, I suppose, given all the media stuff that's been put out, all the forum stuff, and looking up history of what the NCAA has done in similar situations in the past, most could make a pretty accurate guess at what will happen.
But I repeat, no one KNOWS but the NCAA and POSSIBLY MH and / or CBP.
And the NCAA probably does not have a final ruling since UT still has a 'day in court' so to speak. If they did, it would be pre-judging wouldn't it ?
I repeat, he's not guessing what the penalties will be. He's hinting at what the athletic office will do. Since, you know, their window for action is BEFORE the final ruling is handed out.
Yes, it would be. I have just been around and seen what people have good track records. And I tend to believe what they say. Nothing is "certain" except death and taxes..and hman drinking PBR.
Ok, I misunderstood you.
But I don't get the window for action is before the ruling.
I guess I'm one who believes nothing will be done BEFORE the NCAA.
I think that's wrongheaded, and I really, really hope that MH isn't thinking that way. If we get hit with serious penalties in June, it's too late in the season to hire a new coach, and we're completely stuck. If we make a move, we have to make it during hiring season. Unfortunately, hiring season is before we get word back from the NCAA. So MH has to act on an educated guess of what the NCAA is going to do. The risk of waiting it out and then deciding is just too high. If we're in the 95% and we wait, it sets the program back years.
Don't disagree and I didn't say that was what I hoped for, but that is what I THINK will be.
I think that's wrongheaded, and I really, really hope that MH isn't thinking that way. If we get hit with serious penalties in June, it's too late in the season to hire a new coach, and we're completely stuck. If we make a move, we have to make it during hiring season. Unfortunately, hiring season is before we get word back from the NCAA. So MH has to act on an educated guess of what the NCAA is going to do. The risk of waiting it out and then deciding is just too high. If we're in the 95% and we wait, it sets the program back years.
Fair enough. I'm worried about it, because I don't trust MH. But just looking at the expected values of various courses of action should make it obvious that he needs to make a call now. I really hope that either he or somebody above him sees what's right in front of their face. I don't want more wandering in the basketball desert.
:horse: but the best time would have been September. Making the decision to keep him then forces MH fan to stick with him through June, IMO. Its a roll of the dice, but he bet his chips in September.
I couldn't agree more.
Some have stated that violating the bump rule after that took MH off the hook but I don't.
I don't think the bump will be much if any a factor in the final outcome.
Just my opinion.
I don't think the NCAA wants to set the precedent of allowing the school and conference to make their decisions for them.did any of those 19 get docked 1.5 million and suspended 8 games before the NCAA ruled. Also, did any of those 19 come clean immediately after their lie? Are we part of the 5% or the 95%? I think there is a good chance shes different.
I understand that this is your opinion, but your opinion doesn't make any sense or have any justification.