State Makes All Adults in England Organ Donors Unless They Object

And I am so glad the government, which now has financial incentive to see me dead, makes that decision.

Like Bham I am a donor, and I dont give one crap what happens to my body once I am gone. But there is no way in hell it's ok to make that decision for someone else.

Your elected state legislators made that decision. Remember Karen Ann Quinlan?

If someone hasn't made plans for their corpse, then families decide what to do. Same if you made plans.
 
Last edited:
I'm more concerned about the government having an incentive to expedite certain individual's deaths if they get to pick through the remains of some of them.
My concern also. And you know those decisions will be made. There will be a financial incentive to look at a person and say is it worth saving and treating this guy or is he worth more dead than alive...
 
Your elected state legislators made that decision. Remember Karen Ann Quinlan?

If someone hasn't made plans for their corpse, then families decide what to do. Same if you made plans.
Sure didnt. Looked her up and there is good reason I dont remember her. She died 4 years before I was born.

And not sure how our government profits like the all knowing all beneficial universal health care of Ye Olde Britain does.
 
It's bizarre that the parents tried to pull the plug on KAQ and she managed to outlive Jimmy Hoffa by several years. He disappeared three months after she went comatose and he wasn't legally declared dead for another 7 years. KAQ: "Hold my feeding tube and watch this". She was one of the most famous people in the country in 1975 while in a vegetative state. So was Hoffa but they never figured out which "state" he was in.

Wild times in the US news in 1975. Patty Hearst was a fugitive, Jimmy Hoffa disappeared, and Karen Ann refused to pass away while her parents battled to unplug her. All at the same time. And Saigon was falling to the VC that spring. Now it's news whether or not Trump wears a Rona mask.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volinbham
Offer FMV to the decedent's family for organs and you'll get a better participation rate. The hospital has no qualms cutting out your organs for free and then turning around and charging $500k to sew them into someone else. My FIL was at the blood bank and he suggested that if they wanted better participation they could send you the test results from the screenings they do on the donations. People and companies are very interested in data quantification and health metrics so it seems pretty logical. The person he talked to said there would be privacy issues. Giving you the results to your own blood screen.
 
Offer FMV to the decedent's family for organs and you'll get a better participation rate. The hospital has no qualms cutting out your organs for free and then turning around and charging $500k to sew them into someone else.

That would add a whole new level to a Karen Ann Quinlan type of situation. But if all of the legalities of permission were worked out on the front end, it's ridiculous that there is that much money being spread around and nothing goes to the most important, selfless party involved in the process. Total costs would go up so the insurance lobby is going to veto that possibility.
 
That would add a whole new level to a Karen Ann Quinlan type of situation. But if all of the legalities of permission were worked out on the front end, it's ridiculous that there is that much money being spread around and nothing goes to the most important, selfless party involved in the process. Total costs would go up so the insurance lobby is going to veto that possibility.
I'm not saying your family decides, but if you yourself are offered $10k for your kidney and you accept upon your death then you'd see a lot more people do it. At the very least you could help offset funeral costs or pay to settle your affairs.
 

VN Store



Back
Top