Your response was pretty spot on. I make my fall schedule based on Saturdays and football games. Next to my family, watching college football brings me as much joy as about anything could a person. However, I'll never put my wants above the rights of another. How can any person say "this person doesn't deserve this amount of money, much less is plenty enough". I just don't get how someone can think that they can put limits on another persons earning potential based on their own name, image, and likeness. Our love for the sport, is what has made NIL so lucrative for these players. For years and years we have enjoyed the entertainment and joy these players provide, unlimited highs and lows, while these players were expected to only get limited return as a scholarship (aside from the under the table things of course, just speaking in theory of how some people think).
With great freedom comes great responsibility, and yes I do believe these recruits need assistance as far as adults to help navigate them through NIL, through the university.....but as the saying goes, if they're old enough to pay the ultimate price and die for their country at war, then who is anyone else to tell them they're not old enough to take on the responsibility of anything else, especially getting paid. Some, even with education will make bad choices and fail because of getting the big pay day, others will not, they will prosper greatly and have their lives changed for the better, with an opportunity they would have previously never had....in the end it will work itself out like most everything else does in a free market (when its a truly free market).
Does this new world of NIL change things. Absolutely it does. With change comes need for innovation and adaptation. I don't have all the answers, and one of the biggest things I've thought of that I've seen no one mention is what happens when a player can make more in college off NIL than they could by being an undrafted free agent in the NFL....and then they challenge the rule about 4 years of eligibility, does the 4 years of eligibility rule limit a persons earnings potential at that point and break anti-trust laws? I'm not sure, but even with the unanswered questions and concerns, I will always back a persons ability to make money from their own name, image and likeness....especially when someone else is already making millions from it.