SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 51,786
- Likes
- 64,020
I agree. I don't think you are considered vaccinated until like 10 days after your first dose correct?? There are many many examples of people who had adverse reactions just days after vaccination. Some adverse reactions could show up months or possibly a few years after vaccination. Only full transparency will allow us to know the truth about what's causing this.
Prime example of you leaping to conclusions. Are you sure they are adverse reactions? How are you sure? Someone could literally be in the chair getting the jab and die of a heart attack as the nurse depresses the plunger and without more info you don't know whether that is an adverse reaction.
The VAERS database has been around for years.
The CDC has certified over 16,000 Americans that have died after the vaccine — 22% within the first 48 hours. Its well known that VAERS is hugely underreported as it takes time to fill out.
The VAERS database has been around for years.
The CDC has certified over 16,000 Americans that have died after the vaccine — 22% within the first 48 hours. Its well known that VAERS is hugely underreported as it takes time to fill out.
No, but it means they need to be investigated. An overwhelmingly-unusual number of reports to VAERS should most certainly be a red flag.You’ll never understand. I’ll try one last time. VAERS relies upon people reporting what they BELIEVE to be adverse reactions. Their subjective beliefs do mean they were adverse reactions to the vaccine. Their symptoms may or may not be related to the administration of the vaccine. You’re calling then adverse reactions to the vaccine assumes a correlation which has not been made.
Not to mention the large number of adverse events that never make it to VAERs. No one is obligated to report to it as far as I know.No, but it means they need to be investigated. An overwhelmingly-unusual number of reports to VAERS should most certainly be a red flag.
I can assure you that the system was never vilified like this until 2021. I have personally used it several times over the years.
No, but it means they need to be investigated. An overwhelmingly-unusual number of reports to VAERS should most certainly be a red flag.
I can assure you that the system was never vilified like this until 2021. I have personally used it several times over the years.
See above. For publicly traded company, like Pfizer, he wouldn't meet SEC or IRS definitions (162m) of an Executive. Based on info out there, he reports to another director level.
And this also doesn't have the slightest thing to do with the price of eggs in China.
Director of an R&D project or VP...it doesn't matter. Whether or not they are doing gain of function studies that are illegal under a new name is however important. Whether they planned to release such viruses to sell vaccines is of MAJOR importance. These need to be investigated.