A baseball analogy if I may. With 1 out, bottom of the ninth, runner in scoring postition firmly on second base, Dooley steps to the plate and hits a sac fly to advance the runner to third. The bad news is we needed a single to the outfield which could have scored the runner on second to win the game. The good news is there's still one out with Sunseri coming to the plate...
Will Sunseri pan out, maybe... maybe not. But one thing is for sure, it's certainly far from the homerun hire this fan base and recruiting class needed. Dooley had an opportunity to invoke excitement back into the program and fanbase with the hire of a PROVEN DC. Instead we're once again hiring (for whatever reason, money, lack of interest due to the one-and-done likelihood of Dooley's tenure) a "lotsa potential" guy. How'd that work out for Fulmer when he hired Clawson? Insanity.
As a side bonus, with this hire he's managed to piss off one of the program most loyal coaches and proven recruiters (Lance Thompson).
The dumpster fire that is the current state of our football program sadly.... blazes on.
:twocents:
So we pull a PROVEN winner off a NC team who has (again) a Proven track record and promote him one level up to DC and this is a dud hire????
The guy is also one of the top recruiters in the league.
Here's how this conversation goes wit recruits?
Wanna win a NC? I have and UT has and together we will win another with players like you.
Wanna know what it feels like to shut a team out of a bowl game? I know what it feels like.
Oh and her's my resume of players I've helped get to the first round in the NFL.
Pulls out list a mile long and watches it roll down the living room floor and into the carpet.
Any questions????
This guy could end up being BETTER than Shannon.
VolBeef, I get the feeling you don't like Dooley very much?
It has nothing to do with whether I like him or not. I think he seems to be a good guy. But I think he was hired to do a job that's above him. I don't blame him for taking the gig. It's a great job and the $ is good. So it's not on him.
I laugh at those who fall all over themselves and cannot look beyond their emotional connection to UT and therefore they fail to see that DD is NOT the guy that will take us where we want to be. And they defend EVERY move he makes no matter what and bash anyone who dares to point it out. That's what I dislike.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
It has nothing to do with whether I like him or not. I think he seems to be a good guy. But I think he was hired to do a job that's above him. I don't blame him for taking the gig. It's a great job and the $ is good. So it's not on him.
I laugh at those who fall all over themselves and cannot look beyond their emotional connection to UT and therefore they fail to see that DD is NOT the guy that will take us where we want to be. And they defend EVERY move he makes no matter what and bash anyone who dares to point it out. That's what I dislike.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Would you please show us some posts of people legitimately praising him as you always claim. I think you ignorantly claim this about people that don't share your view. Just because people disgaree with your assessment of Dooley, at this point, doesn't mean they are praising them. It could be an issue with your contextual understanding, or lack thereof. It could be you think in nothing but absolute extremes. At least provide proof of your assessment of those you claim to be slurpers. IF not, you should really STFU
Would you please show us some posts of people legitimately praising him as you always claim. I think you ignorantly claim this about people that don't share your view. Just because people disgaree with your assessment of Dooley, at this point, doesn't mean they are praising them. It could be an issue with your contextual understanding, or lack thereof. It could be you think in nothing but absolute extremes. At least provide proof of your assessment of those you claim to be slurpers. IF not, you should really STFU
You don't have to look very far. Just a few before your post. NEOCON is a fine example.
Most of us who realize DD is in over his head give him credit when he does well. Example is bringing in Wilcox, that was a good hire. The difference is that you slurpers wet your panties everytime he makes a move and defend him no matter what.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
On the flip side, there are those in the opposite camp that have an opposite opinion and they see that DD IS the guy "that will take us where we want to be". Of course both camps can't be right and We both know what opinions are. That being said, let's @ least agree to disagree without splitting up the checkerboard.they fail to see that DD is NOT the guy that will take us where we want to be. And they defend EVERY move he makes no matter what and bash anyone who dares to point it out. That's what I dislike
Let's not jump ahead here hot rod. Let him have a winning season first. Then we'll talk.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
You don't have to look very far. Just a few before your post. NEOCON is a fine example.
Most of us who realize DD is in over his head give him credit when he does well. Example is bringing in Wilcox, that was a good hire. The difference is that you slurpers wet your panties everytime he makes a move and defend him no matter what.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I'm not saying that noone has the right to hate him. What I AM saying is that there are people that made up their minds, before he had ever coached a game, that they hated him and would hate him even IF he won 10 games next year. And it's not that I LOVE the guy, but I believe ANY coach should get at least three years. Especially if they walk into what Dooley walked into. That said, if we don't have a winning season next year I'm done with Dooley. I really expect 8 wins. If we have only 7 wins but are VERY competitive in other games against quality opponets then maybe I'm still on board. Bottom line is that I, like everyone else, expect to see major improvement over last year.