Dobbs was good. Certainly not dynamic. Dynamic QBs aren't 3rd string in the NFLYea, he made the break thru with a dynamic QB. That can overcome alot, see the Dobbs effect at UT.
It's a talent deal now. Butch Jones could coach that Clemson team to a playoff appearance. It would be difficult to find a coach that couldnt.
You do accept they players are purchased?
To a degree yes, I have zero doubts in my mind that Saban's little helpers step in to lend a hand when the recruiting battle is close. I also fully believe that they Stretch Armstrong the rule book for players in the system, seems like all of them drive nice cars. But I do think that happens at all SEC schools minus Vandy, it's just on a much larger scale at Bama.
I also think all of the cheating in the world wouldn't produce what Saban has done without a quality staff.
Fill UT recruiting classes with 4 and 5 stars and you just need competent coaching to compete with Bama. This idea that Saban has this unprecedented ability to always find great assistants isnt realistic. The fact these assistants get to coach the best talent around is realistic and factual.
Manziel was overrated. Sorry, but watch some of those clips. His receivers made him look far better than he was.
A couple of considerations:
A lot of college athletics will go away - particularly women's sports.
If you don't believe that athletes are compensated, then consider the student loan "crisis". The horror stories about student debt should pretty well quantify the fact that athletes are getting paid very well. If the issue is that athletes are basically indentured servants working their way to the NCAA or NBA, take that up with the pro sports who use college athletics as farm teams.
Not necessarily. You can separate profitable sports from non-profitable. You can have a football team full of university employees and a field hockey team with scholarship "amateur" athletes and non-scholarship amateur club athletes.
BUT, if they go away, is that a bad thing? Why should those uninteresting sports be propped up by interesting sports? The whole system is unnatural and is a market inefficiency. Pretty much the only reason we have field hockey scholarships is title IX. Should that exist?
The issue isn't indentured servitude. It's not that they're not compensated. It's that the NCAA has monopoly power and set up an anti-competitive system that violates anti-trust law and allows firms to collude to pay employees with only benefits. This would not fly in any other arena of life, but we're doing it to kids because they basically have no power.