VolnJC
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2012
- Messages
- 26,989
- Likes
- 36,976
Well you did say that then you mealy mouthed to rationalize Trump's decision. Right now I'm trying to figure out the world play, since NATO is sidelined.
What's your opinion on the world play? exclude any dem or trump ref. It you have that feeling, form it in the context of "We, the United States".
Would have never guessed you would deflect and not answer
No to your question.
Do you feel we abandoned the Kurds?
I was initially taken aback over "dumping" an ally, even a conditional one, to allow another nation to go after them with overwhelming force. And truth be told, I'd likely pick the side of the Kurds anyway since I despise the Turks. So, yeah, I was bothered over the way it went down.
However, taking a step back and looking over it objectively, I tried to see what other options there were. There really aren't any good avenues we could have taken as a nation. We tried negotiating, that didn't work and the Turks were going to go in after they walked away.
Regardless, we were faced with either continuing to support the Syrian Kurds and opposing Turkey, a NATO ally, and putting our forces in harm's way or stepping back. Neither choice was good. But I'll err on the side of keeping our troops safe for the moment and see how this unfolds.
Again, past failures to actually set up a legitimate and recognized Kurdish homeland with a democratically elected government are coming back to haunt us. And that's on Trump. And Obama. And Bush 43. And Bush 41. This problem transcends political parties and Presidencies. There's more to it overall, but I won't bore you with the complicated details since, in the words of one of your lawyer buddies, it's "simple."
Well you did say that then you mealy mouthed to rationalize Trump's decision. Right now I'm trying to figure out the world play, since NATO is sidelined.
What's your opinion on the world play? exclude any dem or trump ref. It you have that feeling, form it in the context of "We, the United States".
I'll ask you. Tell me the strategic importance of if having US troops in Syria. How will that put meat and bread on the average American dinner table, save their jobs and wages and better secure their civil liberties and quality of life on Main Street America?The average American can name a city in Afghanistan, name a terror group besides Al-Qaeda and can’t tell you the the strategic importance of U.S. troops in Syria.
Foreign policy most of the time a matter of just playing the game, not getting bent over, and forcing your opponent to show up so you can look him in the eye. In this you prevent one man from running the table (Russia)I'll ask you. Tell me the strategic importance of if having US troops in Syria. How will that put meat and bread on the average American dinner table, save their jobs and wages and better secure their civil liberties and quality of life on Main Street America?
You didn't say one thing that answered my question.Foreign policy most of the time a matter of just playing the game, not getting bent over, and forcing your opponent to show up so you can look him in the eye. In this you prevent one man from running the table (Russia)
Also need continue to fight ISIS, to deny Hezbollah freedom of movement and supply and access to oil fields, to keep the Israeli security concerns at bay (because if they feel that Iran is in any way a threat it won’t look good and they will flex their muscles) and most of all to prevent Russia from having a complete foothold in In the Middle East and prevent certain nations from drifting into Russian influence.
Huge difference between reducing our foreign involvement and simply moving our troops out of the way so Turkey can massacre our allies. That’s like defending enormous tax raises and then citing a poll and article saying “most Americans prefer a balanced budget.”
Huge difference between reducing our foreign involvement and simply moving our troops out of the way so Turkey can massacre our allies. That’s like defending enormous tax raises and then citing a poll and article saying “most Americans prefer a balanced budget.”
A poll more relevant to the discussion would be what percent of Americans think it’s okay to abandon the Kurds to slaughter with no tangible benefit to the United States?