05_never_again
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2006
- Messages
- 24,207
- Likes
- 22,093
Their biggest problem is the geography. The land that makes up Afghanistan, either as a stand-alone country or if it were part of another country, is ungovernable as a nation-state the way the West understands that term.I've gotten the impression there are two major types of society (and probably a lot of sub variants). You have whatever we and most European nations are - nation builders with central or tiered governments, and tribal societies. Nation builders seem to be the successful first world countries, and the tribal countries bring up the third world. You work in coordinated fashion to build or you have competing interests that spend too much time fighting to create. Maybe it's too simplistic, but it explains the failure of many states to thrive better than believing that some races are superior to others. Afghanistan and most of the ME seems to be tribal or under the control of feuding factions/warlords - could be a national interest just isn't in their realm of thought.
Their culture is the way it is mostly because of that geography. There are little isolated pockets everywhere that are inhabited, and they do not really have to or like to interact with each other. Given that the isolated pockets are made up of people from different ethnic groups, you have a recipe for disaster. Very difficult to integrate. People who know only that environment will probably never understand, much less get behind, the concept of a unified Afghanistan.
It also doesn't help that for thousands of years they have been stuck between major foreign powers of various sorts, but their territory is still ungovernable even if that dynamic didn't exist.