jaybird_1981
I'm a man, I'm 40!
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2006
- Messages
- 3,209
- Likes
- 3,452
But at the end of the day it’s a video game and not real, correct? So how in the world should a video game ranking mean anything to anybody other than a video game player? In the real world, that non-ranking means zip.They’re now allowed to be in the game due to NIL. They get paid $600 and get a free copy of the game from EA. There are a few who opted out, most notably Arch Manning
Sports simulation games are supposed to represent realism. If you don’t have any interest in video games then I don’t expect you to see it from our standpointBut at the end of the day it’s a video game and not real, correct? So how in the world should a video game ranking mean anything to anybody other than a video game player? In the real world, that non-ranking means zip.
You are correct. I have no interest whatsoever. But I can assure you that any offensive ranking that leaves out UT is an absolute joke and is nowhere close to realism.Sports simulation games are supposed to represent realism. If you don’t have any interest in video games then I don’t expect you to see it from our standpoint
Half the stadiums ranked above Tennessee on that list aren't even worthy to sniff Neyland Stadium's proverbial jock strap.
A&M ranked #1 is just insane since they are I think I read 24-20 in SEC play at home since joining the conferenceMichigan at #16 is even more of a slap than Tennessee. Notre Dame and Texas are too low as well.
Tennessee isn't the only one getting the shaft.
Michigan and Tennessee are both top 5 stadiums IMO.
So Tennessee won't be higher than an 83 in either offense or defense. This is ****ing ridiculous. This is why Tennessee hates the media. It's constant nonsense like this trying to diminish our team's success.
Tennessee had an 84 offense and 88 defense in ncaa 14. So these guys are basically saying that Tennessee is worse now than in Butch Jones's first seasonProblem is that Tennessee did it to itself. If you play the older EA games, we tend to do better than how we did in the real season. That Dooley, Jones, Pruitt run really killed our perception. Part of the reason why is that we had years under all three were we were ranked and people bought the hype only to see us fall flat. People are afraid to buy into the hype. Constantly losing to Florida doesn't help (even when Florida is inferior like last year). Tennessee has one elite season in last 15 years; you are going to get disrespect. Want to break the narrative? Beat Florida soundly, take down Georgia, and win the SEC. I think Heupel is starting to do some of that.
Defense rating is low probably due to no returning starters on the secondary. Offense makes 0 sense but clearly they don't believe in Nico.
Then again, the overall ratings are garbage in EA. I have 2013 and the individual players actually matter more than overall ratings. There are teams with low overall ratings that win consistently (especially with simulation). It is still widely inaccurate as Alabama typically loses to Michigan in the opener on it (someone they beat by 4-5 touchdowns) and then goes on to lose 4-5 games (that Alabama team won the National Title). EA games have always been broken.
Heck, that 2013 game can't even simulate neutral sites so Alabama goes to Michigan and plays in Ann Arbor when the game was in Texas in real life.
Tennessee had an 84 offense and 88 defense in ncaa 14. So these guys are basically saying that Tennessee is worse now than in Butch Jones's first season
I completely understand what you're saying about player rankings, but like, our 8th best WR is a 5 star freshman, we added multiple freshman all Americans through the portal, and this is the deepest team Tennessee has had since the early 2000s. Also the defenses of Colorado, USC, and LSU were basically none existent last yearI get your point but people still considered Tennessee a bigger program back then. Multiple seasons of falling flat turned the media against us. At the time, it only looked like a 3-year aberration with Dooley and a few bad seasons of Fulmer.
Again, though, the overall rankings in the game mean diddly. I have played it enough to know. I see overall 83s do a lot better than overall 88s and beat them consistently. Key is the player rankings not the team rankings.
I completely understand what you're saying about player rankings, but like, our 8th best WR is a 5 star freshman, we added multiple freshman all Americans through the portal, and this is the deepest team Tennessee has had since the early 2000s. Also the defenses of Colorado, USC, and LSU were basically none existent last year