VolForLife83
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2010
- Messages
- 10,264
- Likes
- 11,474
Mind boggling to me that we didn’t make the top 25 offensive list
lol wow, so they think schools like Arizona, Memphis, Kansas, and Virginia Tech will all have better offenses than Tennessee this year? LOL. LOLLL. I look forward to the inevitable "yeah we effed up" admission, because boy did they ever eff that up. I realize they'll say "oh it's because it's based on individual player ratings" or whatever, but if that's the case, then you messed up on those player ratings, buddies.
Just for laughs, I grabbed Memphis's rankings to compare against Tennessee's (just to pick one).
Tennessee's offensive rankings playing in the Southeastern Conference -
2021 - 9th
2022 - 1st
2023 - 19th
Memphis's offensive rankings against whoever-the-hell they played -
2021 - 36th
2022 - 39th
2023 - 14th
But Memphis with have the 19th best rated offense and Tennessee will go unranked offensively. Sure. Sure, that tracks. Idiots.
Do they take competition into account? Nobody with any understanding of football would compare the competition Memphis played with what UT played and use those stats for a ranking. That’s ludicrous.Supposedly, they used last years stats and returning production. Call it the Milton effect. Plus returning QBs got a big bump for these rankings.
Memphis was #6 in the nation last year at 39.6, UT was 37th in the nation last year at 31.8 ppg.
Agree, bigger beef for me that Neyland isn’t top 10 college stadiums (atmosphere). Could easily argue Neyland is top 5. IF they are using last years stats, I can see where they would slide TN. Had this game came out last year using the previous years stats, good chance UT is #1 in ranking.Do they take competition into account? Nobody with any understanding of football would compare the competition Memphis played with what UT played and use those stats for a ranking. That’s ludicrous.
I take it to mean playtesters and focus groups enjoyed playing the game as Colorado. They have a couple of flashy skill players on offense, and a player can defeat a good team with a couple of good players on an average team. That is the video game aspect of it.Come on they have colorado top 10 and top 25 in both offense and defense you can’t take that seriously
We must have done something that made them feel disrespected. I don’t care if we did. But that’s the only thing that makes sense. Like maybe we didn’t let them into our facilities when they asked or something like that. Don’t matter. Vols by fiddy.Wow, and I thought they were gonna be a bit more accurate with this release. I also seen where their stadium rankings don't include us. What a fn joke and slap in the face.
I believe that I read that they will be doing updates throughout the year, like Madden, so hopefully our team will be significantly better a few weeks into the season.Madden always updates player ratings and such throughout the season so I imagine EA will do the same with College Football since we now have real players in the game
It’s embarrassing that one of the few rationale takes in this thread is coming from a UGA fan.My reaction to this is “Who gives a shite what EA Sports thinks?” They have shown tons of love to GA and as a Dawg myself I can honestly say that it means nothing to me and changes my opinion not one bit.
And honestly, the fact that TN was left out of the top 25 in offensive rankings should give you an idea of the credibility of those assigned to come up with these rankings. I’m certainly no TN fan (no offense intended), but to think there will be 25 or more teams with a better offense than the Vols this season is asinine at best.
My reaction to this is “Who gives a shite what EA Sports thinks?” They have shown tons of love to GA and as a Dawg myself I can honestly say that it means nothing to me and changes my opinion not one bit.
And honestly, the fact that TN was left out of the top 25 in offensive rankings should give you an idea of the credibility of those assigned to come up with these rankings. I’m certainly no TN fan (no offense intended), but to think there will be 25 or more teams with a better offense than the Vols this season is asinine at best.
I see your point and agree. You’re right, had their rating shown my beloved Dawgs in an unfair and negative light my opinion would not be just to say and think that they don’t matter.Good grief, we've already been over this. This isn't just a disagreement of opinions. "What EA Sports thinks" impacts the actual gameplay. I can't speak for the "dissing Tennessee" angle, but the ratings will have a direct impact on the game experience. So here we are, excited to play the first college football game in a decade, and EA's basically saying "hey, thanks for your 59.99 but your big high octane offense actually sort of sucks this year."
Imagine if they'd made this game in 2024 and Brock Bowers was given an 82 rating as a TE, and the game didn't reflect the impact Bowers had at the position. Surely you can concede, at a bare minimum, how grating that would be? I do believe, if I were a Dawg, that I would be just the slightest bit pissed.