AM64
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 28,570
- Likes
- 42,398
Yeah, why does it have to be one or the other, I don’t think anyone thinks fossil fuels are going away over night, and I certainly don’t think everyone on the planet can live off renewable energy alone. At least in what’s left of my lifetime. In this particular case, one company across every energy platform, natural gas, wind, nuclear, failed it’s customers spectacularly.
The thing about building a new fossil plant is return on investment. You and I realistically know that Biden and the dems can't make that go away like they are trying to do, but when you are selling the investment; the question very much remains whether the plant will stay in operation for the projected period, or will coal supplies just dry up, or will some new regulation in effect end the ability to keep operating. It can be a decade to even break ground on a nuclear plant, and there are several nuclear plants across the country that were virtually complete and never loaded fuel and others prematurely decommissioned - that's a lot of cost to eat. It's risky business. I first thought TX was probably nearing capacity and not keeping pace with demand, but as someone else correctly pointed out the peak demand in TX is summer and a lot of plants are probably going through scheduled maintenance outages.