85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 33,043
- Likes
- 65,240
The guys that were part of the tut analysis now admit it’s shortcomings.Once again they didn't use this new technique on the remains from King Tut and his family to disprove the previous results. This was nothing more than word salad. The reason they won't test the mummies from King Tut's family is because this is how King Tut's family looks:
View attachment 551812
Queen Tiye, the Great Royal Wife of Amenhotep III, mother of Akhenaten and grandmother of Tutankhamun
View attachment 551814
The Great Pharaoh Amenhotep III, husband of Tiye, father of Akhenaten and grandfather of Tutankhamun
View attachment 551815
The Great Pharoah Akhenaten, husband to Queen Nefertiti and father to the boy King Tutankhamun
View attachment 551816
Mektaten, second daughter of Pharaoh Akhenaten and his Wife Nefertiti, sister to Tutankhamun
View attachment 551817
Head of the statue of a princess, one of the six daughters of Akhenaten and Nefertiti
View attachment 551818
View attachment 551819
And finally King Tut himself.
Those are clearly a bunch of black people. And the only DNA tests to be done on them thus far showed they were most closely related to Sub-Saharan Africans. The scholars you cite would rather test unknown individuals from the north of the country than the most famous royal family in Ancient Egyptian history because it's clear to anyone with eyes that these people were black.
Ask yourself this. Why do we not see these faces more often? Is it because of their unambiguous African features?
Here is actual DNA Phenotypic Reconstruction -
![1684328793420.png 1684328793420.png](https://www.volnation.com/forum/data/attachments/528/528871-89ea5860ad17c172705ff6546a9e413a.jpg)