vol_in_ar
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2006
- Messages
- 36,291
- Likes
- 1,596
I am not aware of many first amendment con law cases hat worked on.
The case you refer to Tenacious is the case where the Supreme Court said that satire was protected.
Lane Kiffin is a public figure, so it will be difficult for him to successfully sue anyone.
When a story says "It is rumored that..."
it is difficult to sue as well.
Truth is an absolute defense in any case like this.
Satire is not available as a defense for these rumors because it is clear that the site wants you to believe them.
If I made a site that said, "Kiffin is a devil worshipper who sleeps with Ed Orgeron" and put photoshopped pictures of Kiffin making out with Adam Lambert, under the website Kiffinissogay.com it would be protected speech. A reasonable person would understand that I was mocking Kiffin.
In addition, there are other things that make it far more difficult to argue a case of libel if you are a public figure as coach dumba$$ would no doubt count towards. He would have to prove that the accusation was false. But he would also have to prove that the person making the accusation knew it was false at the time of printing, AND continued to make said statement in 'actual malice.'
Of course you realize, 95% of the people following this thread only care about TMZ turning up naughty pics of Layla. X getting spanked (poor choice of words?) by the NCAA is secondary.
Lexus of Knoxville got their money. What insurance didn't cover, Kiffin paid out of his own pocket. After my story went to press last night, the dealership said they would issue an official statement. It will be on the WVLT news tonight.So why hasn't Lexus of Knox tried a stronger angle at getting their money back from damages? I imagine they don't want to flush away future UT business, but I doubt it would bite them now...