I've heard the cacophony of protests to simply let this die, both from some who are amongst us, and other outsiders speaking into the situation.
I sincerely empathize with those who feel that this serves as little more than a perpetual reminder of a tumultuous and painful parting, and regret that it may somehow serve to exacerbate an already difficult situation, in any way. I really do. More importantly, I apologize if such has served to cause our University, our program, or our fanbase to be shown in any negative light, whatsoever, as this was not my, nor do I think it anyone's, intention to do so.
Unfortunately, such seems both necessary and unavoidable. But such is neither because we are "jilted lovers" who are bloodthirsty for revenge, nor "ignorant hillbillies" who's anger makes us willing to scorch the earth and all within it, but because the truth deserves to be told - whatever it is, wherever it leads, whomever it involves, or whatever may result from its being brought to light. It is only then that we will know what, if anything, may have actually occurred.
If these scandals are proven to be true, all involved should be required to assume their responsibility for having committed or attempting to cover them up. If they are disproven, all involved deserve their rightful exoneration.
And so, despite the urgings of Jim Rome, the local or national media, USC fans, or even those disinterested amongst us, well continue until the truth is known, or until every single aspect and lead has been found to be unproven, impossible, or otherwise leaves nothing more than a final, though possibly inconclusive, end. To do otherwise is to allow the lingering possibility that these things could have occurred, or that powerful interests from within and/or outside of our program could have attempted to prevent their disclosure, should be unconscionable to anyone who truly loves this program, and wishes it well.
Far from causing harm, the persistent questioning of the events surrounding Xs August automobile accident has directly resulted in the release of more facts than had been reported at any time since the accident occurred. The difficulty which we now face is that these facts seem to introduce more questions than they answer. For example:
· Why did Lexus of Knoxvilles press release by definition, a document meant to provide information glaringly fail to provide even the most basic facts surrounding the incident, and which would be clearly within their ability to provide? Why is there no mention of the date of the accident? Which, proper authority was contacted to report it, and by whom? What was damaged on the car, and what was the estimated cost of its repair? Was it Xs personal automobile policy which covered the damages, or was it the Universitys?
· If the UTAD did perform an, inquiry into the matter when it happened, as Tiffany Carpenter stated in todays paper, what did that entail? Were other coaches interviewed? If so, which coach vouched for his being seen in the practice facility at midnight, as was reported in the ESPN article? Were any of the neighbors interviewed? Did they attempt to interview any other passenger in the car? If a final report exists, who was it presented, and who made the final decision not to proceed to a formal, investigation? Its curious how the incident was so easily dismissed, and yet now, proves so difficult to explain.
· For the previous week, several media outlets have commented that neither the Knoxville Police Department nor the Knox County Sheriffs Office had any record of any report being filed in relation to this incident. How then did a report finally surface yesterday? Why does the report not indicate the date and time that the report was either completed or filed, and by whom (it only says that the report was approved by Tom Spangler but makes no mention as to who the actual reporting officer was, if different)? Why would some information be purposefully blackened out on the report, considering its public record? Is it possible to drive a car through a fence without a dimes worth of damage to either of them according to this report it is. Was the car even on scene when the report was made? Was the officer who completed the report?
· We assume that the woman who reported the incident first noticed the car at 8:45am, presumably, after having awoken that morning. Couldnt the accident have actually occurred at that time, and not earlier?
· If a car crashed through your fence in the, early morning hours, do you think that you would hear it? Would any of your neighbors? What if the accident occurred even from a distance of a few hundred yards do you still think youd hear it?
· Its understandable that X wouldnt have contacted the neighbor in the middle of the night when the accident is alleged to have occurred, that is if you believe that rapping on their door would have proved more disturbing that crashing through their fence. He was apparently equally conscientious of not disturbing the police, too, so at least he was acting in a consistent manner.
· Has it been established that Layla was at home at the time of the accident because doing so would certainly corroborate Tiffany Carpenters earlier comments that he was on his way home to see his family. If not, why?
And these are just some of the questions surrounding his August accident.
If even a small portion of the ever-growing list of accusations are proven to be true, then it becomes obvious that those who are officially or informally entrusted with the care of our program, at best, did nothing towards its correction, and at worse, willfully attempted to hide or subdue them for the protection of their own interests, and at the betrayal of everything and everyone else.
If thats the case, then our program is in far greater peril than we may realize, and its damaging effects could not only be far worse than anything which might befall us in losing a coach, or in appearing overzealous to some, but perpetually so.