The cancel culture is getting out of control

[n_huffhines]

Please answer the question. Is it wrong or racist to use the terms, or simply dated?

If the former, why don't those organizations change their names?

You didn't fkn ask that question as far as I know. Has anybody said it's racist to say negro? I haven't. You're on on one. I ask for clarification. Then you act like I'm the one not answering questions. Again, wtf are you talking about? Again, what is your point?

 

[AM64]

Please answer the question. Is it wrong or racist to use the terms, or simply dated?

If the former, why don't those organizations change their names?

I think huff and some others are missing the essence of the whole argument and that being "cancel culture". Some words and usage go out of style like many other facets of our lives. That's not really what we are talking about here, though. This is about non evolutionary change; it's about forced change ... change to the dictates of some group of people who wish to force their new, righteous, virtuous ways on society. Generally they way they go about it is destroying by one method or another an existing norm, and often the means to achieve their ends is to slander and demean any malingerers who resist the revolution. The left (although being the party of science and believers in evolution) just doesn't believe in evolution of society; they prefer revolution where they are the Creationists.

 

[AM64]

That's a long way of saying books are indeed banned

He didn't say they were banned, and they aren't banned. Almost any library has limited funds and space available, so they prioritize. That doesn't mean books are banned; it simply means others were selected. There are plenty of books that would be inappropriate for a grade school library and plenty of reasons having nothing to do with what the left thinks should go on shelves.

 

[SamRebel35]

Huff: This thread is insufferable!

Proceeds to post 25 more times in as many minutes.

 

[C-south]

He didn't say they were banned, and they aren't banned. Almost any library has limited funds and space available, so they prioritize. That doesn't mean books are banned; it simply means others were selected. There are plenty of books that would be inappropriate for a grade school library and plenty of reasons having nothing to do with what the left thinks should go on shelves.

You can’t tell a liberal that thinks they make up all the rules on EVERY SUBJECT.

 

[n_huffhines]

He didn't say they were banned, and they aren't banned. Almost any library has limited funds and space available, so they prioritize. That doesn't mean books are banned; it simply means others were selected. There are plenty of books that would be inappropriate for a grade school library and plenty of reasons having nothing to do with what the left thinks should go on shelves.

This is BS semantics. If it's books they don't have budget for, then why is it only 800 or so books? Wouldn't it be all the books minus the books they have budget for? This is about budgets? Sounds like they are using resources to remove books.

 

[n_huffhines]

I think huff and some others are missing the essence of the whole argument and that being "cancel culture". Some words and usage go out of style like many other facets of our lives. That's not really what we are talking about here, though. This is about non evolutionary change; it's about forced change ... change to the dictates of some group of people who wish to force their new, righteous, virtuous ways on society. Generally they way they go about it is destroying by one method or another an existing norm, and often the means to achieve their ends is to slander and demean any malingerers who resist the revolution. The left (although being the party of science and believers in evolution) just doesn't believe in evolution of society; they prefer revolution where they are the Creationists.

I've asked what the point is multiple times. How did you arrive at this?

So the point is that the left is unique in forcing their virtues on others? That's why he's asking about the word negro?

Wtf is happening in here?

 

[AM64]

This is BS semantics. If it's books they don't have budget for, then why is it only 800 or so books? Wouldn't it be all the books minus the books they have budget for? This is about budgets? Sounds like they are using resources to remove books.

View attachment 565601

Sounds like your activists started stuffing shelves with their propaganda and it didn't go over well with the natives. So books were pulled wholesale for review. Stuff happens when you force a viewpoint, people fight back, and the result can be widespread. My personal view on some is that matters of sex whether normal, gay, or whatever don't belong in public schools in the first place (certainly not grade school) - that includes some other topics, too, but this deals with "culture". As @creekdipper said earlier, students can still get books by other means which one would suppose would be public libraries and online ebook libraries.

Anybody know if Mark Twain books are banned for racist words after years of being classics?

 

[creekdipper]

That's a long way of saying books are indeed banned

"Banned" means that something can't be obtained. To say that some things can't be obtained in schools is to be so painfully obvious that one wonders why anyone bothers to point it out.

The government is not "banning" any books. Amazon will gladly prove that truth.

Weapons are banned in schools, too, although perfectly legal elsewhere. Does that upset you?

 

[creekdipper]

This is BS semantics. If it's books they don't have budget for, then why is it only 800 or so books? Wouldn't it be all the books minus the books they have budget for? This is about budgets? Sounds like they are using resources to remove books.

View attachment 565601

Name a single school library that was "closed" or "emptied of books."

 

[RikidyBones]

This is BS semantics. If it's books they don't have budget for, then why is it only 800 or so books? Wouldn't it be all the books minus the books they have budget for? This is about budgets? Sounds like they are using resources to remove books.

View attachment 565601

So you want gender queer available to 2nd graders in the school library?

 

[SamRebel35]

Parent groups pressuring the government to remove certain books from the school library is NOT book banning. What self respcting 'libertarian' would even entertain such a stupid notion?

 

[SamRebel35]

Remember when a certain 'libertarian' was breathlessly fanning himself because "Maus" was removed from curricula in favor of "Diary of Anne Frank" and that was an example of a 'Book Banning'? Lol. Clown show.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

I agree with that, and that's the crux of "counter culture". The real point is whether as a whole something is derogatory or just whether another group is claiming it is. Which group do you believe, and where is the right in forcing one group's opinion on the other? The Confederate flag was not necessarily a symbol of hate when I grew up, and I certainly never heard the song "Dixie" use as a "weapon". Yet a vocal minority turned what so many saw as simple history into a display of something offensive. I turned 77 a couple of days ago and largely grew up in the South (a very few years outside the South as a military brat); in all those years I can't say I ever met a KKK member or a neo-Nazi, and I doubt that younger people can honestly claim they have either.

But it was always a hateful symbol. It was used to show the blacks their place by a great many people. Not everyone used it in the same manner, but enough did that should be retired. It was a celebration of history, specifically a time in history when whites owned blacks and fought for the right to do so.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

That's a long way of saying books are indeed banned

I am of the opinion that works of literature that do not appeal to the prurient interest should be available at age appropriate times.

 

[n_huffhines]

"Banned" means that something can't be obtained. To say that some things can't be obtained in schools is to be so painfully obvious that one wonders why anyone bothers to point it out.

The government is not "banning" any books. Amazon will gladly prove that truth.

Weapons are banned in schools, too, although perfectly legal elsewhere. Does that upset you?

You're moving the goalposts you fkn fraud. Why did you write 500 words about the school library system if this doesn't count as banning? Nobody said anything about a book being entirely illegal in the US. You're not fooling anyone.

 

[n_huffhines]

Name a single school library that was "closed" or "emptied of books."

Why? I already proved the point and you moved the goal post. It's not like you're going to ever accept you're wrong.

In December 2021, the Llano County Commissioners Court, an elected governing body of the county, voted to close the library for three days to check the shelves for "inappropriate" books, however "inappropriate" was not defined, court documents show.

Book ban battle threatens Texas library system's fate

 

[n_huffhines]

Sounds like your activists started stuffing shelves with their propaganda and it didn't go over well with the natives. So books were pulled wholesale for review. Stuff happens when you force a viewpoint, people fight back, and the result can be widespread. My personal view on some is that matters of sex whether normal, gay, or whatever don't belong in public schools in the first place (certainly not grade school) - that includes some other topics, too, but this deals with "culture". As @creekdipper said earlier, students can still get books by other means which one would suppose would be public libraries and online ebook libraries.

Anybody know if Mark Twain books are banned for racist words after years of being classics?

What a waste of time this post is. I proved the point. Accept it. He said it was a lie. It's not. Don't @ me with justification for it. Just say, "Yeah, it wasn't a lie."

 

[SamRebel35]

Why. I already proved the point and you moved the goal post. It's not like you're going to ever accept you're wrong.

In December 2021, the Llano County Commissioners Court, an elected governing body of the county, voted to close the library for three days to check the shelves for "inappropriate" books, however "inappropriate" was not defined, court documents show.

Book ban battle threatens Texas library system's fate

Oh look another example of parents telling the government what books should be allowed in a publicly funded school. Totally the same thing as a book ban. This is the stupidest hill I've ever seen you attempt to die on.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

"Banned" means that something can't be obtained. To say that some things can't be obtained in schools is to be so painfully obvious that one wonders why anyone bothers to point it out.

The government is not "banning" any books. Amazon will gladly prove that truth.

Weapons are banned in schools, too, although perfectly legal elsewhere. Does that upset you?

So, you're saying that the government is not banning books, but won't allow certain books in school libraries. That dog don't hunt.

 

[SamRebel35]

So, you're saying that the government is not banning books, but won't allow certain books in school libraries. That dog don't hunt.

Parents telling the government what their kids shouldn't be able to read is not the same as the government telling parents what their kids shouldn't be able to read.

 

[EasternVol]

What is your point? I don't know what happened, and who cares really? It doesn't matter

Of course it matters. We need to know how and why words go from accepted to unaccepted and vice versa. It's part of understanding our society.

 

[hog88]

Parents telling the government what their kids shouldn't be able to read is not the same as the government telling parents what their kids shouldn't be able to read.

Why is there a need for parents to tell the government what books their kid shouldn't read? Shouldn't it be the parents telling their kids not to read certain books?

 

[SamRebel35]

Why is there a need for parents to tell the government what books their kid shouldn't read? Shouldn't it be the parents telling their kids not to read certain books?

First, I didn't say there was a need for the parents to do so. I said it isn't the same as the government doing so. Taxpayers informing taxpayer funded schools what they would prefer in the taxpayer funded school libraries does not, in my opinion, constitute a ban, and certainly not in the same way that government forcing the issue would be.

 

[hog88]

First, I didn't say there was a need for the parents to do so. I said it isn't the same as the government doing so. Taxpayers informing taxpayer funded schools what they would prefer in the taxpayer funded school libraries does not, in my opinion, constitute a ban, and certainly not in the same way that government forcing the issue would be.

I get what you're saying but removing books from a school library because the majority (hardly ever is the majority, just the most vocal) wants them removed is the same as a book ban. Now, if parent A doesn't want their kid to read XYZ book I have no issue with them informing the school and the school enforcing their wishes by not allowing the kid to check out the book. But I have a problem with other parents deciding what is acceptable reading material for my kid, I pay taxes also.

And no porn shouldn't be in a school library so let's just take that absurd discussion off the table.