i wanted to let the board cool down a bit before posting this.
but, i think part of the reason tee martin and jay graham are not at tennessee is a direct consequence of the spread.
there are positives and negatives to everything.
the negative of the spread is that only a few run it and only a few coach it. some don't even want to coach it. they don't believe in it philosophically and if they rise in the coaching ranks that's not the route they want to go.
well, since tennessee has never run the spread, there is no vfl who is familiar with the spread.
this is a blessing in a way. it's one thing for players to adjust to a new system, but you don't want coaches to have to adjust to a new system.
it also ain't a picnic going back from the spread to a more traditional offense when the time comes.
don't be too hard on tee or jay. it makes a whole lot of sense
I think there is merit to this post. At least as much merit as the posts I've seen regarding Ainge or Basilio's comments. Truth be told, it's probably a little of all of the above.
As with all schemes, there are different versions. Urban Meyer's offense with Tim Tebow, Gus Malzahn's no huddle with Cam Newton, Chip Kelly's no huddle, etc...
So, the question is why would a RB Coach, or a QB coach not come to/stay at Tennessee? Money? Sure. Status/title? Sure. Better program currently? Sure. Easier recruiting grounds? Sure.
Why not offensive philosophy? Tee Martin, Jay Graham and Randy Sanders all came up in a similiar college system. QB, under center, 2 backs, a TE , shotgun for 2nd, 3rd and long, no huddle at the end of halves...etc..In other words, a system, like most NFL teams had until very recently.
Tennessee has not recruited a dual threat QB in some years. Tennessee hasn't typically recruited small, very fast RB's. This is going to be much different going forward.
I think it is all together possible, as you stated 99, that many coaches don't believe in the philosophy and to go further...many think it's a gimmick. Do I? No. However,if I were a coach that had a back ground for some years in the wing T and now I had to call plays out of a pistol with one back...there would be a learning curve, no? Some coaches would be up for learning something new, others might move on and continue to teach what they know. Further, recruiting is effected by the offense or defense a school runs and it's probably hard to convince a kid that he's good for any old system. More plainly, if a RB knows he's splitting carries on the goal line with the QB (Tim Tebow, for instance) , does he go to UF or Alabama?
I've seen Chaney's offense mentioned in comparison to CBJ's. That is absolutely apples and oranges. The numbers bear it out. How many 1000 yard rushers did Chaney have at Purdue or UT? Butch Jones on the other hand nearly always has one, though at CMU, it was the QB and even at Cincy, if the QB wasn't the leading rusher he was #2.
Couple all of that with the fact that every other coach on board is ready to hit the ground running In The System...I have no issue with Martin or Graham, they have their reasons and they did their time as players and both were outstanding players for UT.