The Democratic Party cheated the 2020 election

#426
#426
What's sad here is that it is not going to change the outcome.
There is been an audit of votes, more than likely the most in depth audit of any election.
(AZ) came up with basically the same results and they were checking the paper it was printed on in that detail.
If roles were reversed Republicans would be telling the Democrats to get over it. Some Republicans are telling Republicans to get over it as well and get focused.
*8 people are running and ruining the Republican party
 
#429
#429
BernardKingGOAT said:
Hats off to you! I honestly applaud your efforts, but just because you do it doesn't mean similarly disabled adults should be required to do it too. I'm sure you get that
Click to expand...
Absolutely I do....but also understand those people will do whatever they think is important...oh dr apt...gott get outta the house that...need my pills. Gotta go the pharmacy...need that McDonald...go right there...oh gotta vote well I'll just mail it in..seems we need to rethink priorities and if voting is not important as going out to eat then you shouldn't be allow to mail it in
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#430
#430
BernardKingGOAT said:
Maybe. Maybe not. Not relevant. Lots of disabled citizens use special transportation to/from medical appointments. Nevertheless, you're conflating completely different scenarios
Click to expand...
Those special transports will take them to vote as well..they do grocery store etc..
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#431
#431
ClearwaterVol said:
On the whole there are just better ways to the voting, but the goal isn't to do it better the goal is always to gain an advantage. This directed towards both parties. Why not just do it like they do you credit cards? Credit card one day and pin number on some other?
Click to expand...
I like that idea....should be in person tho..
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#432
#432
Sudden Impact said:
What's sad here is that it is not going to change the outcome.
There is been an audit of votes, more than likely the most in depth audit of any election.
(AZ) came up with basically the same results and they were checking the paper it was printed on in that detail.
If roles were reversed Republicans would be telling the Democrats to get over it. Some Republicans are telling Republicans to get over it as well and get focused.
*8 people are running and ruining the Republican party
Click to expand...
Had the case been heard when relevant to the election and not 3 years later. It might have had an impact..without tracking there is no way to tell hence why the law chnaged and the committee is being held to follow thier rules
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#434
#434
ClearwaterVol said:
My signature never looks the same. GOP just trying to frustrate voters into not voting.
Click to expand...

My signature never comes out the same either. Since "cursive" is going away in schools, how will people in the future be able to sign or read another signature. Seems like a new form of illiteracy. The point is if ballots are not hand delivered to the recipient at a voting location where only the voter can make selections, there is no security in the voting process. That means people could sign the ballot and hand them to collectors to fill in. It also means a scribbled signature that doesn't match what's on record won't even get a cursory look. Ever think that someone receiving ballots might even accept or reject signatures by noting a key choice? If someone moves frequently, a dozen ballots could be sent to him/her all across the country to be filled in by anyone; that's fraud but who gets the blame? Nobody (most likely), the person named on the ballot, the fraud filling it in, ...? Sloppy process; we're better than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85 and hog88
#436
#436
ClearwaterVol said:
On the whole there are just better ways to the voting, but the goal isn't to do it better the goal is always to gain an advantage. This directed towards both parties. Why not just do it like they do you credit cards? Credit card one day and pin number on some other?
Click to expand...

Still leaves it wide open for the person receiving the ballot to fill in the verification and turn the ballot over to someone else to fill in. People have bought votes for years ... this is just an easier way to do it.
 
#440
#440
hog88 said:
how so?
Click to expand...
For starters, comparing it to a grocery store visit. Of course all you have to do now is order online and pickup at the store without having to get out of your car. Looking at it in that manner is more of an applicable comparison as to why mail-in voting can be more efficient and less timely. Thanks for bringing it up👍
 
#441
#441
BernardKingGOAT said:
🤭🤭 Over half the voters who show up to vote in Tennessee are less informed
Click to expand...

Well ... going by the results of at least the past 6 elections at a minimum (the last 4 especially so) an overwhelming majority of voters all over the country are to put it mildly ... less informed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, BernardKingGOAT, AM64 and 1 other person
#442
#442
BreatheUT said:
What scientific evidence led to this discovery? What sampling method was used? Did you include a standard deviation to account for inaccuracies?
Click to expand...
Knowing the best candidates in both parties aren't making it out of the primaries. Purely subjective, of course. I think it's funny you asking about "scientific" evidence in a thread about cheating in elections. Elections in which all scientific evidence goes against rigged claims. Never mind the fact that people like you NEVER mentioned rigged elections until Trump and your Fox News' blowhards told you there was cheating, when in FACT, none could be substantiated. More often than not, Republicans have been caught cheating in recent years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sudden Impact
#444
#444
whodeycin85 said:
Had the case been heard when relevant to the election and not 3 years later. It might have had an impact..without tracking there is no way to tell hence why the law chnaged and the committee is being held to follow thier rules
Click to expand...
60 or 61 cases, several recounts in several states,
If, coulda, woulda, shoulda. Oh boy.
What is amazing is that reality or acceptance doesn't hold water after 3 years.
Just Sad.
No impact in the election or electoral college.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
#445
#445
Sudden Impact said:
60 or 61 cases, several recounts in several states,
If, coulda, woulda, shoulda. Oh boy.
What is amazing is that reality or acceptance doesn't hold water after 3 years.
Just Sad.
No impact in the election or electoral college.
Click to expand...
So your saying the 270k votes found to have significant signature differences wouldn't have effected the AZ election??
 
#447
#447

Court: Democrat Secretary Of State’s 2022 Rules For Poll Challengers Violated Michigan Law​

BY: SHAWN FLEETWOOD
OCTOBER 23, 2023

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s guidance burdening poll challengers violates state law, a state appeals court ruled on Thursday.

In a 3-0 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals determined that guidance issued by Benson, a Democrat, ahead of last year’s Aug. 2 primary elections violated provisions of the state’s Administrative Procedures Act, which outlines rulemaking authority for state agencies. More specifically, the court reaffirmed an October 2022 trial court ruling that Benson’s guidelines “reach beyond defendants’ general supervisory scope” and ordered that they be revised or rescinded.

thefederalist.com

Court: Michigan's 2022 Poll Challenger Rules Violated State Law

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson's guidance burdening poll challengers violates state law, a state appeals court ruled on Thursday.
thefederalist.com thefederalist.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#448
#448
BreatheUT said:

Court: Democrat Secretary Of State’s 2022 Rules For Poll Challengers Violated Michigan Law​

BY: SHAWN FLEETWOOD
OCTOBER 23, 2023

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s guidance burdening poll challengers violates state law, a state appeals court ruled on Thursday.

In a 3-0 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals determined that guidance issued by Benson, a Democrat, ahead of last year’s Aug. 2 primary elections violated provisions of the state’s Administrative Procedures Act, which outlines rulemaking authority for state agencies. More specifically, the court reaffirmed an October 2022 trial court ruling that Benson’s guidelines “reach beyond defendants’ general supervisory scope” and ordered that they be revised or rescinded.

thefederalist.com

Court: Michigan's 2022 Poll Challenger Rules Violated State Law

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson's guidance burdening poll challengers violates state law, a state appeals court ruled on Thursday.
thefederalist.com thefederalist.com
Click to expand...

And none of the challenges had any effect on the elections. You guys love to just sling stuff with no analysis whatsoever.
 
#449
#449
ClearwaterVol said:
And none of the challenges had any effect on the elections. You guys love to just sling stuff with no analysis whatsoever.
Click to expand...


This was a good place to put the article.

Sometimes the purpose is not to interject but to share information. You can make your own assessments. Stop believing that your opinion is the expert opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#450
#450
BreatheUT said:
This was a good place to put the article.

Sometimes the purpose is not to interject but to share information. You can make your own assessments. Stop believing that your opinion is the expert opinion.
Click to expand...
You put an article in here and omitted the most pertinent facts in your direct quote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbovol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top