The George Floyd Monument

#276
#276
DinkinFlicka said:
Lectures about learning "actual facts."

Proceeds to misspell the name.

Checks out.
Click to expand...
That’s the problem. All those that supported her knew was her name because that’s all they cared to know. I’d rather be guilty of misspelling her name than be minus the actual facts of what really happened
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#277
#277
1vol8 said:
That’s the problem. All those that supported her knew was her name because that’s all they cared to know. I’d rather be guilty of misspelling her name than be minus the actual facts of what really happened
Click to expand...

It's just hard to take anything you say as fact when you miss the mark on something so fundamental to the case.
 
#279
#279
Wireless1 said:
Innocent might be a stretch, a child riding in the back seat of a car hit by stray bullets is innocent, sleeping with a drug dealer that sleeps with a gun.,..not so sure
Click to expand...

I'm willing to bet that a good deal of posters here have a gun very close at hand in their bedrooms. Constitution says he can have it regardless of motive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clarksvol00
#286
#286
Weezer said:
He wasn't a felon. He was a legal gun owner.

Breonna Taylor shooting: What to know about boyfriend Kenneth Walker (courier-journal.com)
Click to expand...
However there was still a reason they achieved a no knock warrant on HER apartment as well as the other houses. I think it’s safe to say that not all the true details ever came out and she may have been completely innocent. But she also could’ve been the shooter as well. SWAT or not, officers are well trained with their weapons and she was hit 7-8 times. He was hit 0. That suggests they took aim at her which no person in their right mind would if he was the actual shooter like he claimed
 
#287
#287
1vol8 said:
However there was still a reason they achieved a no knock warrant on HER apartment as well as the other houses. I think it’s safe to say that not all the true details ever came out and she may have been completely innocent. But she also could’ve been the shooter as well. SWAT or not, officers are well trained with their weapons and she was hit 7-8 times. He was hit 0. That suggests they took aim at her which no person in their right mind would if he was the actual shooter.
Click to expand...

Have there ever been any claims from anyone, including the officers, that Taylor fired at them?
 
#288
#288
clarksvol00 said:
Have there ever been any claims from anyone, including the officers, that Taylor fired at them?
Click to expand...
Their testimony says they don’t know who fired. I suppose that could be the case if they were both standing together at the end of a 4ft wide hallway. But still somewhat beside the point because in a gun fight it’s only reasonable to assume you’ll be hit standing right beside the threat. The question is “why” was her apartment included in the warrant? She’s not completely innocent no matter how you slice it.
 
#289
#289
1vol8 said:
However there was still a reason they achieved a no knock warrant on HER apartment as well as the other houses. I think it’s safe to say that not all the true details ever came out and she may have been completely innocent. But she also could’ve been the shooter as well. SWAT or not, officers are well trained with their weapons and she was hit 7-8 times. He was hit 0. That suggests they took aim at her which no person in their right mind would if he was the actual shooter like he claimed
Click to expand...
Only everyone involved identified him as the shooter. And he only fired one shot. Ballistic evidence supports this. All other shots came from the detectives. They got the warrant on mostly outdated information. Breonna Taylor and the man they were searching for(and had already found) were no longer together. She had a new BF, the one who was there when the police busted in. And your "officers are well trained with their weapons" argument flies completely out the window when one of those officers was fired for recklessly discharging his gun.

She was in her own home where she had a reasonable expectation of privacy and security. She had not committed a crime. She was an innocent woman gunned down by police in her own home. That is truth.
 
#290
#290
Weezer said:
Only everyone involved identified him as the shooter. And he only fired one shot. Ballistic evidence supports this. All other shots came from the detectives. They got the warrant on mostly outdated information. Breonna Taylor and the man they were searching for(and had already found) were no longer together. She had a new BF, the one who was there when the police busted in. And your "officers are well trained with their weapons" argument flies completely out the window when one of those officers was fired for recklessly discharging his gun.

She was in her own home where she had a reasonable expectation of privacy and security. She had not committed a crime. She was an innocent woman gunned down by police in her own home. That is truth.
Click to expand...
The cop that was fired was fired because he missed and it hit the wall going into the next apartment. The same would happen to any of us if we miss our threat and endanger others. But if you’ve never been in a gunfight you can’t be so critical of one misplaced shot. Thankfully no one else was hurt by it.


And they claim him as the shooter because he admitted to it. Not because they “know” he was.
 
#291
#291
1vol8 said:
Their testimony says they don’t know who fired. I suppose that could be the case if they were both standing together at the end of a 4ft wide hallway. But still somewhat beside the point because in a gun fight it’s only reasonable to assume you’ll be hit standing right beside the threat. The question is “why” was her apartment included in the warrant? She’s not completely innocent no matter how you slice it.
Click to expand...
"Well, we weren't sure who was shooting at us, so we opened fire indiscriminately, including firing shots that went into other dwellings."
 
#292
#292
1vol8 said:
Their testimony says they don’t know who fired. I suppose that could be the case if they were both standing together at the end of a 4ft wide hallway. But still somewhat beside the point because in a gun fight it’s only reasonable to assume you’ll be hit standing right beside the threat. The question is “why” was her apartment included in the warrant? She’s not completely innocent no matter how you slice it.
Click to expand...
Her only "guilt" was by former association. The target was her ex-BF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clarksvol00
#293
#293
1vol8 said:
The cop that was fired was fired because he missed and it hit the wall going into the next apartment. The same would happen to any of us if we miss our threat and endanger others. But if you’ve never been in a gunfight you can’t be so critical of one misplaced shot. Thankfully no one else was hurt by it.


And they claim him as the shooter because he admitted to it. Not because they “know” he was.
Click to expand...
One misplaced shot? How many hit Breonna Taylor again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: clarksvol00
#294
#294
1vol8 said:
The cop that was fired was fired because he missed and it hit the wall going into the next apartment. The same would happen to any of us if we miss our threat and endanger others. But if you’ve never been in a gunfight you can’t be so critical of one misplaced shot. Thankfully no one else was hurt by it.


And they claim him as the shooter because he admitted to it. Not because they “know” he was.
Click to expand...
Read the piece I posted. The interim police chief fired Det. Hankison for "blindly" firing 10 rounds into Taylor's apartment. Not one. Hankison was actually brought up on charges.

Are you a LEO, former LEO, or related to LEOs? Is that why you're attempting the blue wall? Cops are human and make mistakes too. In this case, they made a deadly mistake. There is no excusing it IMO.
 
#295
#295
Weezer said:
Only everyone involved identified him as the shooter. And he only fired one shot. Ballistic evidence supports this. All other shots came from the detectives. They got the warrant on mostly outdated information. Breonna Taylor and the man they were searching for(and had already found) were no longer together. She had a new BF, the one who was there when the police busted in. And your "officers are well trained with their weapons" argument flies completely out the window when one of those officers was fired for recklessly discharging his gun.

She was in her own home where she had a reasonable expectation of privacy and security. She had not committed a crime. She was an innocent woman gunned down by police in her own home. That is truth.
Click to expand...
Also, listen to what you just said. “They got the warrant on outdated information” “The man they were looking for and already found”

If they already found him and HE was all they were looking for, why even waste a trip to her apartment? Do you know how warrants work? You get a warrant for something specific. When you carry out that warrant, you can’t find something else to charge for. For example: if I’m a cop executing a warrant for stolen refrigerators, I HAVE to find stolen refrigerators. I can’t find no refrigerators and still arrest you because you had weed.

Point is there was an interest in her apartment that had nothing to do with him. Otherwise they wouldn’t have risked their lives for nothing.
 
#298
#298
1vol8 said:
Also, listen to what you just said. “They got the warrant on outdated information” “The man they were looking for and already found”

If they already found him and HE was all they were looking for, why even waste a trip to her apartment? Do you know how warrants work? You get a warrant for something specific. When you carry out that warrant, you can’t find something else to charge for. For example: if I’m a cop executing a warrant for stolen refrigerators, I HAVE to find stolen refrigerators. I can’t find no refrigerators and still arrest you because you had weed.

Point is there was an interest in her apartment that had nothing to do with him. Otherwise they wouldn’t have risked their lives for nothing.
Click to expand...
Did you even read the article I linked? I suspect not. I picked that article because it was more about facts than painting a narrative.
 
#300
#300
1vol8 said:
Which they already had in cuffs. So try again.
Click to expand...
Now you're being intentionally dense. You act as if police can't make mistakes. In this case, they clearly did. The information is there if you're willing to read up on the facts of the case and ignore the narratives some are trying to tell (on both sides).
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top