SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 50,883
- Likes
- 62,365
OK. we are ****ed financially with either choice. Let's move on to the other aspects of their administrations. Here's a slam dunk. Border security. Who's better? International relations. (this will be fun).Stop supporting morons or accept that it's going to get ugly very soon. The first one isn't happening so...
Trump will try and build another wall. Hope this one doesn't fall over. Other than that he had no policy to fix it. Deport everyone? Not gonna happenOK. we are ****ed financially with either choice. Let's move on to the other aspects of their administrations. Here's a slam dunk. Border security. Who's better? International relations. (this will be fun).
Or do you somehow you believe that you can change the course of this oncoming train on an anonymous web forum?
So remain in Mexico wasn't working? I agree that they won't all get deported, but at least Trump will put a tourniquet on the severed artery that Puddinhead opened.Trump will try and build another wall. Hope this one doesn't fall over. Other than that he had no policy to fix it. Deport everyone? Not gonna happen
When your foreign policy consists of paying people off to sign docs there's really not a policy. Freaking Kushner is your bored diplomat? Yeah, you're out of ideas
It's screwed either way. I just wish both parties would stop pretending it's not
Oh. OK. well one thing is for sure (of course no doubt you will disagree) Trump acknowledges the problem and is at least talking about doing something about it. HeelsUp will only throw gas on the tire fire she started.There's not a policy to address the ones already here or the country wide need for labor. No, there's no real policy
Harris' thoughts and positions deserve their own thread, they may last through the election.
We are beginning to see the initial outlines of the Harris Doctrine- turning this country into Venezuela. Instead of fixing the root causes of inflation, government policy, Harris wants to fix prices by attacking price gouging.
Catherine Randall in the Washington Post writes...
“Price gouging” is the focus of Vice President Kamala Harris’s economic agenda, her presidential campaign says. She’ll crack down on “excessive prices” and “excessive corporate profits,” particularly for groceries.
So what level counts as “excessive,” you might ask? TBD, but Harris will ban it.
It’s hard to exaggerate how bad this policy is. It is, in all but name, a sweeping set of government-enforced price controls across every industry, not only food. Supply and demand would no longer determine prices or profit levels. Far-off Washington bureaucrats would. The FTC would be able to tell, say, a Kroger in Ohio the acceptable price it can charge for milk.
At best, this would lead to shortages, black markets and hoarding, among other distortions seen previous times countries tried to limit price growth by fiat."
Please find me that clip
But TruuuuuuuummmmmpConsider this is CNN, so this analyst is attempting to be as kind as possible.
At this point it doesn't matter if Harris walks it back after putting her finger in the air to see which way the winds are blowing.
The democrat ticket is a disaster. It might be further left than Bernie Sanders.
CNN commentator shreds Harris' 'totally unworkable' price control plan | Fox News Video
Liberal columnist Catherine Rampell criticized Vice President Kamala Harris' plan to control the prices of groceries and food like in "Venezuela, Argentina, the Soviet Union."www.foxnews.com
It is the same political tactic that Biden used in 2020 and after he took office he stopped the flow of oil that increased the price of freight, that increased grocery prices, that robbed middle class Americans of their earrings. If I were the big oil companies and pharmaceutical companies I would pour money into the Harris campaign to sustain the large profit margins they are getting from the Democrats.Harris' thoughts and positions deserve their own thread, they may last through the election.
We are beginning to see the initial outlines of the Harris Doctrine- turning this country into Venezuela. Instead of fixing the root causes of inflation, government policy, Harris wants to fix prices by attacking price gouging.
Catherine Randall in the Washington Post writes...
“Price gouging” is the focus of Vice President Kamala Harris’s economic agenda, her presidential campaign says. She’ll crack down on “excessive prices” and “excessive corporate profits,” particularly for groceries.
So what level counts as “excessive,” you might ask? TBD, but Harris will ban it.
It’s hard to exaggerate how bad this policy is. It is, in all but name, a sweeping set of government-enforced price controls across every industry, not only food. Supply and demand would no longer determine prices or profit levels. Far-off Washington bureaucrats would. The FTC would be able to tell, say, a Kroger in Ohio the acceptable price it can charge for milk.
At best, this would lead to shortages, black markets and hoarding, among other distortions seen previous times countries tried to limit price growth by fiat."
Not for the informed. Facts are facts. Use some stats and prove it wrong.Is this solely a propaganda thread?
Basic supply/demand concepts were front and center by mid 2020. We've been manipulating our economy for 40+ years. It took a heavy duty catalyst, like the pandemic, for the actual science to take effect. We were flooded with cash and then production of real goods almost grinded to a halt. Of course prices at the stores zoomed upwards. The trek down is always much slower, BUT we must allow the market to determine pricing. Not controlsYou have to wonder if she even has an economic advisor.. basic supply/ demand principles.. and giving people the money just makes houses more unaffordable and in turn will probably make rents go up as well.. who in the world is advising her?