MG1968
That’s No Moon…
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Messages
- 28,393
- Likes
- 19,328
I was fine with leaving out Tom Bombadil (the movie teetered on the homoerotic side enough as is), but skipping the Scouring of the Shire came dangerously close to destroying the whole Trilogy for me. That and screwing up the personalities of the Ents. That part blew my mind completely. I still fast forward through the Ent parts except for their destruction of Saruman.
I don't have a problem with long movies as long as it's interesting and relevant to the story. Godfather is the perfect example. King Kong and LOTR are perfect examples of movies that are ruined by length. The original King Kong was 56 minutes and Jackson made that one into a 3 hour flick.
I felt like LOTR movies got progressively worse (though I still like them all) and they got progressively longer.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey - Rotten Tomatoes
why are Frodo and Galadriel going to appear in this movie? Frodo had yet to be born.
I'm still looking forward to the movie, but Peter Jackson's meddling with the storyline is starting to aggravate.
Looks great, I didn't know Gandalf had a thing with a certain elf, though...
Galadriel was responsible for making him Gandalf the White and she had great power in the Silmarillion but had absolutely nothing to do with the Hobbit. I'm going to be pissed if she plays some sort of important role in this film. Jackson omitted a lot of stuff and made the Ents boring, but he never really just made stuff up in the LOTR, why would he start now?
Galadriel was responsible for making him Gandalf the White and she had great power in the Silmarillion but had absolutely nothing to do with the Hobbit. I'm going to be pissed if she plays some sort of important role in this film. Jackson omitted a lot of stuff and made the Ents boring, but he never really just made stuff up in the LOTR, why would he start now?