The Impeachment Thread

[CagleMtnVol]

Joy Villa turned heads at the Grammy Awards on Sunday with yet another bold pro-Trump inspired gown.

Your daily reminder that Conservative women are

 

[BowlBrother85]

Dems could have fought it in court, they passed they don’t get a redo

You didn't answer the question. If there is nothing to fear from John Bolton's testimony, then why did the White House try to block him from testifying before the House Oversight Committee?

 

[evillawyer]

 

[BowlBrother85]

Then you truly don’t understand how revolting the guy is. But let him testify.

If Donald Trump Is So Upset About Iraq WMD Lies, Why Would He Want to Hire John Bolton?

He should testify.

 

[BigOrangeD]

Precedent? I don't follow you. Are you saying that it should be an established precedent for the White House not to comply with subpoenas? That makes no sense.

Remember Executive Privilege? It will be tough for a DIM to use it in the future after your party just blew it up.

 

[volfanhill]

Dems could have fought it in court, they passed they don’t get a redo

I agree they could have an should have. But are you more interested in “winning” a political situation or knowing the truth? Seems to me we should all want witnesses. But its suspect, bc of how you react to everything, all you care about is your guy winning. Truth be damned

 

[volfanhill]

He should testify.

I agree

 

[BowlBrother85]

Adjectives aside, that is pure spin. Nobody ever thought that Trump would be removed from office. It is about getting the truth on the public record.

 

[evillawyer]

How Fox is covering the NY Times story: those damn leakers.

Bolton slams 'corrupted' National Security Council review process after book excerpt leaks

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[BigOrangeD]

Adjectives aside, that is pure spin. Nobody ever thought that Trump would be removed from office. It is about getting the truth on the public record.

DIMs would not know the truth if it stared them straight in the face.

 

[evillawyer]

Hope this one catches on

 

[BowlBrother85]

Remember Executive Privilege? It will be tough for a DIM to use it in the future after your party just blew it up.

That is an overreach for blocking a former national security adviser from testifying to information which is not of a classified nature and poses no threat to national security.

 

[BowlBrother85]

DIMs would not know the truth if it stared them straight in the face.

And Trump would? Take a good look at who you have hitched your wagon to here. Trump continues to maintain that he doesn't know who Lev Parnas is, in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Do you sincerely consider Donald Trump to be an honest person?

 

[BigOrangeD]

And Trump would? Take a good look at who you have hitched your wagon to here. Trump continues to maintain that he doesn't know who Lev Parnas is, in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Do you sincerely consider Donald Trump to be an honest person?

Stock Market Up
Unemployment Way Down
Wall Being Built
Supreme Court Justices and Federal Judges being appointed.

I'll hitch my wagon to that all day before voting for some baby killing DIM.

 

[0nelilreb]

I agree they could have an should have. But are you more interested in “winning” a political situation or knowing the truth? Seems to me we should all want witnesses. But its suspect, bc of how you react to everything, all you care about is your guy winning. Truth be damned

I wonder why it’s so hard to get people to believe any of them ? Not that I don’t trust a single damn one of them , but don’t you think it’s just a little convenient that this “ bombshell “ is breaking now instead of when the Dems were making their case to the senate ? The Truth seems to be whatever they are telling today .

 

[volfanjustin]

I agree they could have an should have. But are you more interested in “winning” a political situation or knowing the truth? Seems to me we should all want witnesses. But its suspect, bc of how you react to everything, all you care about is your guy winning. Truth be damned

I have no interest in this sham or hoax lasting any longer. They passed on the witnesses because they wanted to rush it. They didn’t do their job.

 

[0nelilreb]

And Trump would? Take a good look at who you have hitched your wagon to here. Trump continues to maintain that he doesn't know who Lev Parnas is, in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Do you sincerely consider Donald Trump to be an honest person?

Thats double edged sword .. do you sincerely believe Schiff , Nadler , Pelosi aren’t liars and are honest ?

 

[volfanjustin]

You didn't answer the question. If there is nothing to fear from John Bolton's testimony, then why did the White House try to block him from testifying before the House Oversight Committee?

Same reason the Biden’s or Eric Ciaramella didn’t testify I guess

 

[volfanhill]

I have no interest in this sham or hoax lasting any longer. They passed on the witnesses because they wanted to rush it. They didn’t do their job.

Do you think he did what he is accused of? I am not asking if you think it warrants impeachment, I don’t believe it does, but do you think he did it?

 

[volfanjustin]

Do you think he did what he is accused of? I am not asking if you think it warrants impeachment, I don’t believe it does, but do you think he did it?

No

 

[volfanhill]

I wonder why it’s so hard to get people to believe any of them ? Not that I don’t trust a single damn one of them , but don’t you think it’s just a little convenient that this “ bombshell “ is breaking now instead of when the Dems were making their case to the senate ? The Truth seems to be whatever they are telling today .

I am sure someone who had access to it, who is no Trump fan, leaked it. Or Bolton did bc he wants to testify.

 

[volfanhill]

No

Then you are brain washed or willfully ignorant. I would guess the vast majority of Trump fans on here think he did but think it’s no big deal or he was interested in fighting corruption. You just don’t think he did it.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Same reason the Biden’s or Eric Ciaramella didn’t testify I guess

No, it's not the same reason. The Bidens and the whistleblower have not yet been subpoena'ed.

 

[0nelilreb]

I am sure someone who had access to it, who is no Trump fan, leaked it. Or Bolton did bc he wants to testify.

Or he’s ramping up for that release date for that $$$ . I just find it extremely odd the timing of it all . But like I said I don’t trust any of them .