luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 46,748
- Likes
- 19,765
He's effectively saying that someone who repeatedly maintained his innocence, claimed his behavior was perfect, and was defended as innocent by his followers was in fact guilty as charged.He's effectively saying somebody was doing 10 over the speed limit yet they’ve been put on political trial for attempted vehicular manslaughter.
Everyone knew all along the senate would not remove him.
The best that could be hoped for was proving his guilt.
He and his followers have once again been forced to take the embarrassing leap from "he is innocent" to "he is guilty, but..........."
Now that guilt has been established and pretty much universally admitted, history can determine if he was going 10 mph over the speed limit or 50 mph over the speed limit while drunk in a school zone. Witnesses and documentation would have clarified but Alexander and the rest decided it was best to admit to wrongdoing that was proven through the available evidence and avoid the embarrassment of seeing just how wrong.