AM64
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 28,590
- Likes
- 42,429
OJ was still most assuredly guilty (at least in the minds of the vast majority).
Who was not allowed to testify that would have refuted factual evidence?
I don't doubt OJ's probable guilt; but when I see what looks like evidence tampering by cops, that all goes out the window. It's like the FBI and Flynn. I don't know whether Flynn did anything wrong or not, but I expect more of the cops (FBI). If the people involved with measuring right and wrong are allowed to be crooked, then you have nothing ... that's something that just isn't negotiable.