The Impeachment Thread

#4,428
#4,428
"Our country will have more presidents. But principles, well, we get just one crack at those. For those who want to put America first, it is critically important at this moment in the life of our country that we all, here and now, do just that. Trust me when I say that you can go elsewhere for a job. But you cannot go elsewhere for a soul."

-Jeff Flake
 
  • Like
Reactions: JCP201
#4,429
#4,429
NorthDallas40 said:
I don’t take issue with any of your three points. And I’ve said multiple times I wish Trump would forget his damn Twitter login.
Click to expand...
But everytime some points out his stupid tweets, you rave like a lunatic about the dems. I guess you have been conditioned to do so.
 
#4,430
#4,430
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and volfanjustin
#4,432
#4,432
NorthDallas40 said:
Yeah at this point they actually do. The fact is, if the provided transcript was altered that’s a problem. Thus far there has been zero information indicating it is not original, however that needs to be put to rest.
Click to expand...
Don't let them pull you into this crap, unlike a few others here you are smarter than that
 
#4,433
#4,433
BowlBrother85 said:
Tweets such as that is where he really makes himself look like an idiot. He is referring to the misleading article from The Federalist on Friday. Some posters in here have run with that too. Apparently, a form with guidelines for potential whistleblowers included some information that was inaccurate and later corrected. That has nothing to do with the applicable statute, however. It is the statute that matters. No form is worth the paper it's printed on if it doesn't correspond with the law.
Click to expand...

Who funds the Federalist again????
 
#4,440
#4,440
volfanjustin said:
Don't let them pull you into this crap, unlike a few others here you are smarter than that
Click to expand...
That bell cannot be unrung at this point. However knowing the methods for marking and tracking classified documents I’m not afraid of a look at this. If they were falsified there has to be a trail. Thus releasing them would be idiocy.
 
#4,442
#4,442
evillawyer said:
For the Trump leg-humpers going cookoo for the change in the Whistleblower form conspiracy theory:

GOP Shows Russian Trolls How It’s Done With Whistleblower Smear
Click to expand...

They simply can't wait to rip to explain to the red hats why this CIA analyst is a an untrustworthy lying progressive that should be charged with treason.

"we don't know who it is, but the only arbiter of reality and facts is donald trump - therefore this whistleblower is clearly a liar."
 
#4,443
#4,443
Septic said:
They simply can't wait to rip to explain to the red hats why this CIA analyst is a an untrustworthy lying progressive that should be charged with treason.

"we don't know who it is, but the only arbiter of reality and facts is donald trump - therefore this whistleblower is clearly a liar."
Click to expand...
If you don’t see that this was planned, (by the Dems) I don’t know if there is any help for you septic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol, AirVol, W.TN.Orange Blood and 1 other person
#4,444
#4,444
So the Trump supporter formula seems to be this:

1) Throw out a nonsensical procedural objection.

2) When it is defeated by your opponent, claim victory anyway.

3) When it is pointed out that you lost the argument and that you cannot claim victory, claim you have triggered your opponent.

4) When the opponent mocks you for being irrational, engage in whatboutism.

5) When opponent points out the fail in your whataboutism, return to # 1. Repeat and hope to run out the clock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128, MontyPython and Mick
#4,446
#4,446
lawgator1 said:
So the Trump supporter formula seems to be this:

1) Throw out a nonsensical procedural objection.

2) When it is defeated by your opponent, claim victory anyway.

3) When it is pointed out that you lost the argument and that you cannot claim victory, claim you have triggered your opponent.

4) When the opponent mocks you for being irrational, engage in whatboutism.

5) When opponent points out the fail in your whataboutism, return to # 1. Repeat and hope to run out the clock.
Click to expand...
I think you mistakenly listed your post strategy that you use here? Whoopsie!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01 and volfanjustin
#4,447
#4,447
Obsessed said:
If you don’t see that this was planned, (by the Dems) I don’t know if there is any help for you septic.
Click to expand...

So the Dem's held a gun to Trump and his idiot lawyers head to strong arm the Ukrainian president to dig up dirt on a political rival?

AND THEN TELL HIM TO ADMIT TO IT.

Are you suggesting this is some Inception sht going down?

You know, sometimes a spade is just a spade.
 
#4,449
#4,449
NorthDallas40 said:
I don’t disagree that it needs to connection to Schitt. I predicated my whole statement to you that it was speculation 🤷‍♂️ This person thus far fits the mold though based on the info beaten into us yearly. That was what got me thinking on it over the weekend.

If this individual was soliciting second hand knowledge on classified information where I work I would have turned their ass in in a New York minute. Fact.
Click to expand...

There is no indication he was soliciting anything. He evidently has a security clearance so they could have just as easily came to him. It could be the President's conversation was so "off" that they were all setting around discussing it.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top