volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,654
- Likes
- 23,622
Breitbart News senior contributor and Secret Empires author Peter Schweizer joined Life, Liberty & Levin Sunday on Fox News Channel to explain Joe and Hunter Biden’s Ukraine connections.
Schweizer told host Mark Levin that the former vice president’s son was being paid by Ukraine despite not having expertise in the energy sector while Joe Biden was the “point-person” on former President Barack Obama’s administration in dealing with Ukraine.
“The key question here that nobody seems to want to ask in the media is: What was he being paid for? He wasn’t being paid for his expertise. What was he being paid for? And what were the Ukrainians expecting to get in return?” Schweizer stated. “I think when you overlay the financial payments with the fact that Joe Biden as point person on Obama administration policy to Ukraine was steering billions of dollars of Western money to Ukraine it becomes crystal clear exactly why they were paying him money. They wanted access and they wanted to influence Joe Biden. And Joe Biden has been around a long time here, and he had to know exactly why his son was being paid.”
Don’t forget they had to blackmail the Trump appointee Atkisson into passing on the report, somehow get Trump’s White House staff to release the call, and intimidate Trump appointee Maguire into repeatedly standing up for the whistleblower at last week’s hearing.So the Dem's held a gun to Trump and his idiot lawyers head to strong arm the Ukrainian president to dig up dirt on a political rival?
Are you suggesting this is some Inception sht going down?
You know, sometimes a spade is just a spade.
Then “they” could have violated the handling requirements for the information. Access to classified information is predicated on two points. A) the proper clearance B) be on the need to know access list.There is no indication he was soliciting anything. He evidently has a security clearance so they could have just as easily came to him. It could be the President's conversation was so "off" that they were all setting around discussing it.
Not only Ukraine but also thru Hunter in China....Trump's two greatest accomplishments imo will be keeping Biden and Clinton...two of the most corrupt politicians out of the WH.The guy that exposed the Clinton Foundation Fraud:
Schweizer: Joe Biden ‘Was Steering Billions of Dollars of Western Money to Ukraine’ for Access, Influence
The president has powers the Constitution confers upon him. He does not have any power not forbidden by the Constitution.
He appoints someone to run the Department of Justice. That institution is designed to be independent. The FBI's term is ten years, precisely to minimize political influence.
We've endured 2.5 years of crazy "Obama is going to get arrested for investigating Trump" conspiracy theories here. Why don't you do us all a favor and tell this thread a president can put criminal investigations on anyone he wants?
Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ
I think it's clear this spy was working with bugeyes. We need a special prosecutor to look in to this. Was there collusion between the planted spy and bugeyes? We need a separate special prosecutor to look into the Biden's/Ukrainian relationship
Not only Ukraine but also thru Hunter in China....Trump's two greatest accomplishments imo will be keeping Biden and Clinton...two of the most corrupt politicians out of the WH.
Ah... You want to equate defrauding the FISA court to asking a foreign head of state to look into corruption that took place in his own country? lol You appear to be very confused.
For some reason he seems to want the Warren matchup maybe he has documents she used minority status to her benefit or because he can push the socialist agenda and economy against her...I'm on record as saying I think she will be next POTUS using same formula as ObamaThe poetic justice it'd be if Trump was able to keep a moderate dem like Biden out while seeing a progressive like Warren catapulted into the WH. If that weren't so G.D. terrifying it would be hilarious.
So how many people will vote out of white woman guilt?For some reason he seems to want the Warren matchup maybe he has documents she used minority status to her benefit or because he can push the socialist agenda and economy against her...I'm on record as saying I think she will be next POTUS using same formula as Obama
Boom! Those two kick azz
No. I'm saying that the president has the right to ask the leader of a different country to look into corruption in his country, and that's a far cry from breaking FISA law and defrauding US courts.If you're giving an explicit green light to political control of the criminal justice system, what do expect is going to happen in the investigations?
Real irony you're advocating this in order to "fight corruption."
I think it's more about being a part of history and electing the first woman...that is what carried Obama to his first victory imo the young and African Americans who normally don't vote showed up for him but for some reason didn't for Clinton even though it would have been history I don't think Warren is as disliked by the younger voters as Clinton was..probably because of the way Bernie was treatedSo how many people will vote out of white woman guilt?