The Impeachment Thread

The guy that exposed the Clinton Foundation Fraud:
Schweizer: Joe Biden ‘Was Steering Billions of Dollars of Western Money to Ukraine’ for Access, Influence


Breitbart News senior contributor and Secret Empires author Peter Schweizer joined Life, Liberty & Levin Sunday on Fox News Channel to explain Joe and Hunter Biden’s Ukraine connections.

Schweizer told host Mark Levin that the former vice president’s son was being paid by Ukraine despite not having expertise in the energy sector while Joe Biden was the “point-person” on former President Barack Obama’s administration in dealing with Ukraine.

“The key question here that nobody seems to want to ask in the media is: What was he being paid for? He wasn’t being paid for his expertise. What was he being paid for? And what were the Ukrainians expecting to get in return?” Schweizer stated. “I think when you overlay the financial payments with the fact that Joe Biden as point person on Obama administration policy to Ukraine was steering billions of dollars of Western money to Ukraine it becomes crystal clear exactly why they were paying him money. They wanted access and they wanted to influence Joe Biden. And Joe Biden has been around a long time here, and he had to know exactly why his son was being paid.”
 
So the Dem's held a gun to Trump and his idiot lawyers head to strong arm the Ukrainian president to dig up dirt on a political rival?

Are you suggesting this is some Inception sht going down?

You know, sometimes a spade is just a spade.
Don’t forget they had to blackmail the Trump appointee Atkisson into passing on the report, somehow get Trump’s White House staff to release the call, and intimidate Trump appointee Maguire into repeatedly standing up for the whistleblower at last week’s hearing.

You can tell Maguire is especially in the tank for the Dems because, as acting DNI, he kept saying he didn’t know if hypothetical election interference by a foreign government should be investigated. Clearly it was 4D chess on their part, making him give stupid answers to protect Trump just to convince everybody he was on Trump’s side.

Honestly if the deep state/Dems were that competent, Trump never would have gotten elected or they would have taken him out with the Mueller probe.
 
I think it's clear this spy was working with bugeyes. We need a special prosecutor to look in to this. Was there collusion between the planted spy and bugeyes? We need a separate special prosecutor to look into the Biden's/Ukrainian relationship
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
Says the man who steadfastly observed the Senate's constitutional obligation to provide advice and consent on the Garland nomination



What he said is actually ominous. He could set on it indefinitely. Moscow Mitch never met a Constitution he obeyed.
 
There is no indication he was soliciting anything. He evidently has a security clearance so they could have just as easily came to him. It could be the President's conversation was so "off" that they were all setting around discussing it.
Then “they” could have violated the handling requirements for the information. Access to classified information is predicated on two points. A) the proper clearance B) be on the need to know access list.

And if what you say was true then “they” should have initiated the complaint. It all gets back to everybody involved has to be interviewed.
 
The president has powers the Constitution confers upon him. He does not have any power not forbidden by the Constitution.

He appoints someone to run the Department of Justice. That institution is designed to be independent. The FBI's term is ten years, precisely to minimize political influence.

We've endured 2.5 years of crazy "Obama is going to get arrested for investigating Trump" conspiracy theories here. Why don't you do us all a favor and tell this thread a president can put criminal investigations on anyone he wants?

Congress Criminal Referral Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Strzok, and Page to DOJ

Ah... You want to equate defrauding the FISA court to asking a foreign head of state to look into corruption that took place in his own country? lol You appear to be very confused.

Now... Unverified, second-hand hearsay, Schiff's fraudulent propaganda on the senate floor, and your pearl clutching aside... WHat behavior?
 
Ukraine Hoax Being Run Out of CIA??, 2782


The Still Report

Published on Sep 30, 2019
Good evening, I’m still reporting on: In our last edition of the Still Report we saw a very hopeful Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows telling us that all is about to be revealed and it will be eyeopening to the American people.
[insert: “Don’t lose faith in Bill Barr….]
As I’ve mentioned several times before, this has all the earmarks of a highly-organized operation – one that only an intelligence agency like the CIA is sufficiently organized to do. Afterall, this is not the first government the agency has taken down over its history, but this would be the largest.
Yesterday, OAN came out with a blistering report on the CIA’s probable involvement with the Ukraine so-called whistleblower – who is really just a thinly-legitimized rumor monger.

 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
Not only Ukraine but also thru Hunter in China....Trump's two greatest accomplishments imo will be keeping Biden and Clinton...two of the most corrupt politicians out of the WH.


The poetic justice it'd be if Trump was able to keep a moderate dem like Biden out while seeing a progressive like Warren catapulted into the WH. If that weren't so G.D. terrifying it would be hilarious.
 
Ah... You want to equate defrauding the FISA court to asking a foreign head of state to look into corruption that took place in his own country? lol You appear to be very confused.

If you're giving an explicit green light to political control of the criminal justice system, what do expect is going to happen in the investigations?

Real irony you're advocating this in order to "fight corruption."
 
The poetic justice it'd be if Trump was able to keep a moderate dem like Biden out while seeing a progressive like Warren catapulted into the WH. If that weren't so G.D. terrifying it would be hilarious.
For some reason he seems to want the Warren matchup maybe he has documents she used minority status to her benefit or because he can push the socialist agenda and economy against her...I'm on record as saying I think she will be next POTUS using same formula as Obama
 
For some reason he seems to want the Warren matchup maybe he has documents she used minority status to her benefit or because he can push the socialist agenda and economy against her...I'm on record as saying I think she will be next POTUS using same formula as Obama
So how many people will vote out of white woman guilt?
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
Boom! Those two kick azz



Would be a mistake, imo. Bannon and Lewandowski are bomb throwers, yes, but all they would do is say things to keep the base happy: perpetuate conspiracy theory, whataboutism with base favorite targets, i.e. Obama, Biden, Clinton, invoke deep state mantras.

But the base already believes all that, and all these two would do is drive everyone else further away. What Trump really needs is a calming influence, someone with experience and a much better sense than Trump has of the long game here. Someone that will get him off twitter and lock Rudy up in a box with no phone or other way to communicate with thew outside world. Slow the process down, drag it out. Continue to confuse the issues and put out dubious legal theories that have no merit but cause delays to counter.

Bringing in more hysterical, frothing at the mouth acolytes, is a mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
If you're giving an explicit green light to political control of the criminal justice system, what do expect is going to happen in the investigations?

Real irony you're advocating this in order to "fight corruption."
No. I'm saying that the president has the right to ask the leader of a different country to look into corruption in his country, and that's a far cry from breaking FISA law and defrauding US courts.

You haven't been able to show one law that Trump has broken. You've actually defended Obama and Biden for doing EXACTLY the same thing Trump supposedly did. You just added the bit that Trump did the exact same thing against his "political rivals", which isn't against the law. It's not against the law to for a R to have a D investigated and vice versa.

You're pearl-clutching. It's pitiful. Grow up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol and Obsessed
So how many people will vote out of white woman guilt?
I think it's more about being a part of history and electing the first woman...that is what carried Obama to his first victory imo the young and African Americans who normally don't vote showed up for him but for some reason didn't for Clinton even though it would have been history I don't think Warren is as disliked by the younger voters as Clinton was..probably because of the way Bernie was treated
 

VN Store



Back
Top